Suppr超能文献

复杂主动脉瘤开窗分支腔内修复术后 1 年瘤囊缩小可带来中期生存优势。

Aneurysm sac shrinkage at 1 year after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair of complex aortic aneurysms offers mid-term survival advantage.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program, Houston, TX.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2024 Oct;80(4):958-967.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.054. Epub 2024 May 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of 1-year changes in aneurysm sac diameter on patient survival after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical data of patients enrolled in a prospective nonrandomized study investigating FB-EVAR (2013-2022). Patients with sequential follow up computed tomography scans at baseline and 6 to 18 months after FB-EVAR were included in the analysis. Aneurysm sac diameter change was defined as the difference in maximum aortic diameter from baseline measurements obtained in centerline of flow. Patients were classified as those with sac shrinkage (≥5 mm) or failure to regress (<5 mm or expansion) according to sac diameter change. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Secondary end points were aortic-related mortality (ARM), aortic aneurysm rupture (AAR), and aorta-related secondary intervention.

RESULTS

There were 549 patients treated by FB-EVAR. Of these, 463 patients (71% male, mean age, 74 ± 8 years) with sequential computed tomography imaging were investigated. Aneurysm extent was thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in 328 patients (71%) and abdominal aortic aneurysms in 135 (29%). Sac shrinkage occurred in 270 patients (58%) and failure to regress in 193 patients (42%), including 19 patients (4%) with sac expansion at 1 year. Patients from both groups had similar cardiovascular risk factors, except for younger age among patients with sac shrinkage (73 ± 8 years vs 75 ± 8 years; P < .001). The median follow-up was 38 months (interquartile range, 18-51 months). The 5-year survival estimate was 69% ± 4.1% for the sac shrinkage group and 46% ± 6.2% for the failure to regress group. Survival estimates adjusted for confounders (age, chronic pulmonary obstructive disease, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, and aneurysm extent) revealed a higher hazard of late mortality in patients with failure to regress (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.52; P = .005). The 5-year cumulative incidences of ARM (1.1% vs 3.1%; P = .30), AAR (0.6% vs 2.6%; P = .20), and aorta-related secondary intervention (17.0% ± 2.8% vs 19.0% ± 3.8%) were both comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Aneurysm sac shrinkage at 1 year is common after FB-EVAR and is associated with improved patient survival, whereas sac enlargement affects only a minority of patients. The low incidences of ARM and AAR indicate that failure to regress may serve as a surrogate marker for nonaortic-related death.

摘要

目的

研究复杂腹主动脉瘤或胸腹主动脉瘤分支型腔内修复术(FB-EVAR)后 1 年内动脉瘤瘤腔直径变化对患者生存的影响。

方法

我们回顾了一项前瞻性非随机研究中纳入的 FB-EVAR 患者的临床数据(2013-2022 年)。纳入基线和 FB-EVAR 后 6 至 18 个月连续随访 CT 扫描的患者进行分析。动脉瘤瘤腔直径变化定义为从中心线流动的基线测量值中最大主动脉直径的差异。根据瘤腔直径变化,将患者分为瘤腔缩小(≥5mm)或未退缩(<5mm 或扩张)。主要终点是全因死亡率。次要终点是主动脉相关死亡率(ARM)、主动脉瘤破裂(AAR)和主动脉相关二次干预。

结果

共 549 例患者接受 FB-EVAR 治疗,其中 463 例(71%为男性,平均年龄 74±8 岁)进行了连续 CT 影像学检查。动脉瘤范围在 328 例患者(71%)为胸腹主动脉瘤,135 例(29%)为腹主动脉瘤。270 例患者(58%)出现瘤腔缩小,193 例(42%)未退缩,其中 19 例(4%)患者在 1 年内瘤腔扩张。两组患者的心血管危险因素相似,但瘤腔缩小组患者年龄较小(73±8 岁比 75±8 岁;P<0.001)。中位随访时间为 38 个月(四分位距,18-51 个月)。瘤腔缩小组 5 年生存率估计值为 69%±4.1%,未退缩组为 46%±6.2%。对混杂因素(年龄、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、慢性肾脏病、充血性心力衰竭和动脉瘤范围)进行调整后,发现未退缩组晚期死亡率的风险更高(调整后的危险比,1.72;95%置信区间,1.18-2.52;P=0.005)。两组 ARM(1.1%比 3.1%;P=0.30)、AAR(0.6%比 2.6%;P=0.20)和主动脉相关二次干预(17.0%±2.8%比 19.0%±3.8%)的 5 年累积发生率均无显著差异。

结论

FB-EVAR 后 1 年瘤腔缩小很常见,与患者生存改善相关,而瘤腔扩大仅影响少数患者。ARM 和 AAR 的低发生率表明未退缩可能是主动脉外相关死亡的替代标志物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验