Suppr超能文献

足部动脉分布区的灌注增加:直接和间接重建小腿动脉的比较。

Perfusion increase in foot angiosomes: Comparison between direct and indirect revascularization of crural arteries.

机构信息

Abdominal Center Department of Vascular Surgery University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital (HUS) P.O. Box 340 Helsinki FI00029 Finland.

Abdominal Center, Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital (HUS), Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Scand J Surg. 2024 Jun;113(2):174-181. doi: 10.1177/14574969241242205. Epub 2024 Jun 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In retrospective studies, wound healing and leg salvage have been better if revascularization is targeted to the crural artery supplying arterial flow to the wound angiosome. No data exist on how revascularization changes the blood flow in foot angiosomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in perfusion after infrapopliteal artery revascularization in all foot angiosomes and to compare directly revascularized (DR) angiosomes to the indirectly revascularized (IR) angiosomes.

METHODS

In this prospective study, foot perfusion was measured with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) before and after either surgical or endovascular below-knee revascularization. According to angiograms, we divided the foot angiosomes into DR and IR angiosomes. Furthermore, in a subanalysis, the IR angiosomes were graded as IR_Coll+ angiosomes if there were strong collaterals arising from the artery which was revascularized, and as IR_Coll- angiosomes if strong collaterals were not seen.

RESULTS

A total of 72 feet (28 bypass, 44 endovascular revascularizations) and 282 angiosomes were analyzed. Surgical and endovascular revascularization increased perfusion significantly in both DR and IR angiosomes. After bypass surgery, the increase in DR angiosomes was 55 U and 53 U in IR angiosomes; there were no significant difference in the perfusion increase between IR and DR angiosomes. After endovascular revascularization, perfusion increased significantly more, 40 U, in DR angiosomes compared to 26 U in IR angiosomes (p < 0.05). In the subanalysis of IR angiosomes, perfusion increased significantly after surgical bypass regardless of whether strong collaterals were present or not. After endovascular revascularization, however, a significant perfusion increase was noted in the IR_Coll+ but not in the IR_Coll- subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Open revascularization increased perfusion equally in DR and IR angiosomes, whereas endovascular revascularization increased perfusion significantly more in DR than in IR angiosomes. Strong collateral network may help increase perfusion in IR angiosomes.

摘要

背景与目的

在回顾性研究中,如果将血运重建的目标指向为创面血管形成单位提供动脉血流的小腿动脉,那么创面愈合和保肢效果会更好。目前尚无关于血运重建如何改变足部血管形成单位血流的相关数据。本研究旨在评估所有足部血管形成单位的胫下动脉血运重建后的灌注变化,并直接比较直接血运重建(DR)血管形成单位与间接血运重建(IR)血管形成单位。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,通过吲哚菁绿荧光成像(ICG-FI)在手术或血管腔内膝下血运重建前后测量足部灌注。根据血管造影结果,我们将足部血管形成单位分为 DR 和 IR 血管形成单位。此外,在亚分析中,如果有来自被重建动脉的强侧支循环,则将 IR 血管形成单位分为 IR_Coll+血管形成单位,如果没有看到强侧支循环,则将其分为 IR_Coll-血管形成单位。

结果

共分析了 72 只脚(28 例旁路手术,44 例血管腔内再血管化)和 282 个血管形成单位。手术和血管腔内再血管化均显著增加了 DR 和 IR 血管形成单位的灌注。旁路手术后,DR 血管形成单位的灌注增加了 55 U,IR 血管形成单位增加了 53 U;DR 和 IR 血管形成单位之间的灌注增加没有显著差异。血管腔内再血管化后,DR 血管形成单位的灌注增加明显更多,为 40 U,而 IR 血管形成单位仅为 26 U(p < 0.05)。在 IR 血管形成单位的亚分析中,无论是否存在强侧支循环,手术旁路均可显著增加灌注。然而,血管腔内再血管化后,仅在 IR_Coll+亚组中观察到明显的灌注增加,而在 IR_Coll-亚组中未观察到。

结论

开放血运重建同样增加了 DR 和 IR 血管形成单位的灌注,而血管腔内再血管化则显著增加了 DR 血管形成单位的灌注,而不是 IR 血管形成单位。强侧支循环网络可能有助于增加 IR 血管形成单位的灌注。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验