Li W W, Liao X, Zeng L, Chu H L
Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Key Laboratory of Epidemiology of Major Diseases (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China.
Center for Evidence Based Chinese Medicine, Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Jun 4;104(21):1911-1917. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20231027-00917.
The number of mixed methods systematic reviews (MMSRs) published internationally is increasing day by day, thanks to the continuous development and improvement of MMSRs methodological guidelines and reporting specification, which effectively promote the depth and breadth of evidence synthesis and integration results. However, the application of this method has yet to be popularized in China. With the continuous development of mixed methods research and evidence-based medicine in our country, the number of MMSRs will gradually increase. This paper aims to analyze the reporting specifications for MMSRs with cases to improve the quality of evidence integration and reporting standardization of domestic relevant researchers in MMSRs.
由于混合方法系统评价(MMSRs)方法学指南和报告规范的不断发展与完善,有效促进了证据综合与整合结果的深度和广度,国际上发表的混合方法系统评价数量日益增加。然而,该方法在我国的应用尚未得到普及。随着我国混合方法研究和循证医学的不断发展,混合方法系统评价的数量将逐渐增加。本文旨在通过案例分析混合方法系统评价的报告规范,以提高国内相关研究者在混合方法系统评价中证据整合的质量和报告的标准化程度。