Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Evid Based Integr Med. 2024 Jan-Dec;29:2515690X241258403. doi: 10.1177/2515690X241258403.
BACKGROUND: A systematic review and meta-analysis have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of alkalinization for COVID-19 patients based on current evidence to determine the impact of alkalinization on COVID-19 outcomes. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (Pubmed), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov for studies evaluating the efficacy of alkalinization up to 30 April 2023. Based on the PRISMA 2020 statement criteria a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies were performed. RESULTS: The results of our meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in mortality rate in the alkalinization group compared to controls (RR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56-0.95; I2 = 0%). However, our subgroup analysis showed no significant improvement in RCT-only studies (RR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.59-1.05; I2 = 0%), the recovery rate was significantly higher in the alkalinization group (RR 2.13, 95% CI: 1.39-3.26; I2 = 0%), duration of recovery also has improved in alkalinization group (SMD 0.76, 95% CI: 0.33-1.18; I2 = 0%). The results of our meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in the duration of hospitalization in the alkalinization group compared to controls with very low certainty of evidence (SMD -0.66, 95% CI: -0.97 to -0.35; I2 = 36%). CONCLUSION: With low certainty of evidence, alkalinization (by sodium bicarbonate) can be an efficient and safe adjuvant treatment for COVID-19 patients. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to strengthen the available evidence.
背景:基于现有证据,对 COVID-19 患者碱化治疗的疗效进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定碱化对 COVID-19 结局的影响。
方法:我们检索了 MEDLINE(PubMed)、Web of Science、Cochrane Library 和 Clinicaltrials.gov,以评估截至 2023 年 4 月 30 日的碱化治疗疗效的研究。根据 PRISMA 2020 声明标准,对研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。
结果:我们的荟萃分析结果表明,与对照组相比,碱化组的死亡率显著降低(RR 0.73,95%CI:0.56-0.95;I2=0%)。然而,我们的亚组分析显示,仅 RCT 研究没有显著改善(RR 0.78,95%CI:0.59-1.05;I2=0%),碱化组的恢复率显著更高(RR 2.13,95%CI:1.39-3.26;I2=0%),碱化组的恢复时间也有所改善(SMD 0.76,95%CI:0.33-1.18;I2=0%)。我们的荟萃分析结果还表明,与对照组相比,碱化组的住院时间明显缩短,证据确定性非常低(SMD -0.66,95%CI:-0.97 至-0.35;I2=36%)。
结论:在证据确定性非常低的情况下,碱化(用碳酸氢钠)可以作为 COVID-19 患者的一种有效且安全的辅助治疗方法。需要进一步的随机对照试验来加强现有证据。
J Evid Based Integr Med. 2024
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-10-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-2-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-11-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-6-13
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-9-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-6-21
Molecules. 2022-12-5
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022-9-20
Ear Nose Throat J. 2024-6