Tchoua Phoebe P, Clarke Emily, Wasser Heather, Agrawal Seema, Scothorn Rebecca, Thompson Kelsey, Schenkelberg Michaela, Willis Erik A
Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Gillings School of Public Health, Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
medRxiv. 2024 May 25:2024.05.23.24307804. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.23.24307804.
Social determinants of health (SDOH) may impact caregivers' ability to implement evidence-based health practices at home during early childhood, especially in families with children with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Therefore, we examined the influence of SDOH and children's diagnosis (typically developing [TD], Down syndrome [DS], autism) on caregiver's self-report of meeting evidence-based health practices.
Caregivers (n=172) of children ages 2-6 years (TD: n=93, DS: n=40, autism: n=39) completed an online survey on SDOH and health practices related to child nutrition (CN), physical activity (PA), outdoor play (OP), and screen time (ST). A total SDOH score was computed by assigning 1 point for each favorable SDOH metric (range 0-13). Linear regressions were used to examine associations between SDOH and CN, PA, OP, ST health practices and the moderating effect of IDD diagnosis.
Most caregivers were non-Hispanic White (84.3%), female (76.7%), 18-35 years old (55.2%), and married (89.5%). The DS group had the lowest SDOH score (mean = 8.4±1.0) compared to autism (mean = 10.1±1.0) and TD (mean = 11.0±0.9). No family scored 100% in evidence-based practices for any health practice. SDOH score was significantly associated with evidence-based practices met score for CN (b = 1.94, 95% CI = 0.84, 3.04; p = 0.001) and PA (b = 4.86, 95% CI = 2.92, 6.79; p <0.0001). Moderation analysis showed no association in the DS and autism groups between SDOH score and CN percent total score, or between SDOH score and CN, PA, and OP for percent evidence-based practices met. SDOH score was also not associated with OP percent total score for the DS group.
This study highlights the differential influence of SDOH on caregivers' implementing health practices in families with children of different IDD diagnoses. Future research is needed to understand impacts of SDOH on non-typically developing children.
健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)可能会影响照顾者在幼儿期在家中实施循证健康实践的能力,尤其是在有智力和发育障碍(IDD)儿童的家庭中。因此,我们研究了SDOH和儿童诊断(典型发育[TD]、唐氏综合征[DS]、自闭症)对照顾者关于达到循证健康实践的自我报告的影响。
2至6岁儿童的照顾者(n = 172)(TD:n = 93,DS:n = 40,自闭症:n = 39)完成了一项关于SDOH以及与儿童营养(CN)、身体活动(PA)、户外玩耍(OP)和屏幕时间(ST)相关的健康实践的在线调查。通过为每个有利的SDOH指标赋予1分来计算总SDOH得分(范围0 - 13)。使用线性回归来研究SDOH与CN、PA、OP、ST健康实践之间的关联以及IDD诊断的调节作用。
大多数照顾者是非西班牙裔白人(84.3%)、女性(76.7%)、18 - 35岁(55.2%)且已婚(89.5%)。与自闭症组(平均 = 10.1±1.0)和TD组(平均 = 11.0±0.9)相比,DS组的SDOH得分最低(平均 = 8.4±1.0)。没有家庭在任何健康实践的循证实践中得分达到100%。SDOH得分与CN的循证实践达标得分(b = 1.94,95%置信区间 = 0.84,3.04;p = 0.001)和PA的循证实践达标得分(b = 4.86,95%置信区间 = 2.92,6.79;p <0.0001)显著相关。调节分析表明,在DS组和自闭症组中,SDOH得分与CN总分百分比之间,或SDOH得分与CN、PA和OP达到循证实践百分比之间均无关联。SDOH得分与DS组的OP总分百分比也无关联。
本研究强调了SDOH对不同IDD诊断儿童家庭中照顾者实施健康实践的差异影响。需要进一步的研究来了解SDOH对非典型发育儿童的影响。