• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Are orthopaedic randomized controlled trials as statistically fragile as portrayed? A call for improved interpretation of the statistical fragility index.

作者信息

Oeding Jacob F, Ayeni Olufemi R, Senorski Eric Hamrin, Zaffagnini Stefano, Grassi Alberto, Samuelsson Kristian

机构信息

Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA.

Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.

出版信息

J Exp Orthop. 2024 May 31;11(3):e12042. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.12042. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.1002/jeo2.12042
PMID:38826499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11141499/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caf9/11141499/c8edd796d361/JEO2-11-e12042-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caf9/11141499/c8edd796d361/JEO2-11-e12042-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caf9/11141499/c8edd796d361/JEO2-11-e12042-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Are orthopaedic randomized controlled trials as statistically fragile as portrayed? A call for improved interpretation of the statistical fragility index.骨科随机对照试验在统计学上是否如所描述的那样脆弱？呼吁改进对统计脆弱性指数的解释。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 May 31;11(3):e12042. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.12042. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
The Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in Emergency Medicine Are Frequently Fragile.随机对照试验在急诊医学中的结果往往是脆弱的。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;73(6):565-576. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.10.037. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
3
The Fragility and Reliability of Conclusions of Anesthesia and Critical Care Randomized Trials With Statistically Significant Findings: A Systematic Review.具有统计学意义的麻醉和重症监护随机试验结论的脆弱性和可靠性：系统评价。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):456-462. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003527.
4
The Number of Patients Lost to Follow-Up May Exceed the Fragility Index of a Randomized Controlled Trial Without Reversing Statistical Significance: A Systematic Review and Statistical Model.失访患者数量可能超过随机对照试验的脆弱性指数而不改变统计学显著性：一项系统评价和统计模型
Arthroscopy. 2025 Feb;41(2):442-451.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.006. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index.随机对照试验结果的统计学显著性往往很脆弱：关于脆弱性指数的一个案例。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;67(6):622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.019. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
6
Are results from randomized trials in anesthesiology robust or fragile? An analysis using the fragility index.麻醉学随机试验的结果是否稳健或脆弱？使用脆弱指数进行分析。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2020 Mar;18(1):116-124. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000200.
7
The Statistical Fragility of Tranexamic Acid Use in the Orthopaedic Surgery Literature: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.《矫形外科文献中氨甲环酸使用的统计学脆弱性：随机对照试验的系统评价》。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Jun 1;32(11):508-515. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00503. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
8
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery.整形外科中统计学显著的随机对照试验的脆弱性。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov;144(5):1238-1245. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006102.
9
The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomised controlled trials in the urological literature.随机对照试验在泌尿外科学文献中统计显著性结果的脆弱性。
BJU Int. 2018 Jul;122(1):160-166. doi: 10.1111/bju.14210. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
10
Beyond the Usual Significance: Fragility Indices of Randomized Controlled Trials in Top General Orthopaedic Journals.超越常规意义：顶级普通骨科期刊中随机对照试验的脆弱性指数
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2025 Mar 15;33(6):e340-e347. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00691. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
How statistically fragile are randomized controlled trials comparing quadriceps tendon autografts with hamstring or bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?在膝关节前交叉韧带重建中，比较股四头肌肌腱自体移植与腘绳肌或髌腱-骨自体移植的随机对照试验在统计学上有多不可靠？
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Nov 4. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12535.

本文引用的文献

1
Reverse Fragility Index Comparing Rates of Rerupture After Open Achilles Tendon Repair Versus Early Functional Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.比较开放性跟腱修复术后再破裂率与早期功能康复的反向脆弱性指数：一项随机对照试验的系统评价
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;52(4):1116-1121. doi: 10.1177/03635465231178831. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
2
The fragility of statistical findings in distal biceps tendon repairs: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.远端肱二头肌腱修复术的统计学结果的脆弱性：一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Aug;32(8):e379-e386. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.022. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
3
The Majority of Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy-Related Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting Nonsignificant Results Are Statistically Fragile.
大多数报道无显著性结果的运动医学和关节镜相关随机对照试验在统计学上是脆弱的。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Sep;39(9):2071-2083.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.02.022. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
4
The Reverse Fragility Index: Interpreting the Current Literature on Long-Term Survivorship of Computer-Navigated Versus Conventional TKA: A Systematic Review and Cross-Sectional Study of Randomized Controlled Trials.反向脆弱性指数：解读当前关于计算机导航与传统全膝关节置换术长期生存率的文献：一项随机对照试验的系统评价和横断面研究
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Jan 18;105(2):157-163. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00311. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
5
Empirical assessment of fragility index based on a large database of clinical studies in the Cochrane Library.基于 Cochrane 图书馆中大量临床研究数据库的脆性指数的实证评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Mar;29(2):359-370. doi: 10.1111/jep.13787. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
6
The Fragility Index of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Management Strategies of Anterior Shoulder Instability.比较前肩不稳定管理策略的随机对照试验中统计学显著发现的脆弱指数。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jul;51(8):2186-2192. doi: 10.1177/03635465221077268. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
7
Statistical Fragility of Surgical Clinical Trials in Orthopaedic Trauma.骨科创伤外科临床试验的统计学脆弱性。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 Nov 19;5(11):e20.00197. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00197.
8
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Controlled Trials in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.髋膝关节置换随机对照试验中统计学显著结果的脆弱性。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):2211-2218.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.015. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
9
The fragility of findings of randomized controlled trials in shoulder and elbow surgery.肩肘外科随机对照试验结果的脆弱性。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Dec;28(12):2409-2417. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.051. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
10
Handling missing data in RCTs; a review of the top medical journals.随机对照试验中缺失数据的处理；顶级医学期刊综述
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Nov 19;14:118. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-118.