Kantaras Paris, Kokkinopoulou Anna, Hageman Jeske H J, Hassapidou Maria, Androutsos Odysseas, Kanaki Maria, Bovee-Oudenhoven Ingeborg, Karaglani Eva, Kontochristopoulou Aikaterini-Maria, Bos Rolf, Manios Yannis
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Department of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences, International Hellenic University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Front Pediatr. 2024 May 17;12:1328709. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1328709. eCollection 2024.
This study aimed to investigate growth and gut comfort of healthy infants fed with a partially hydrolysed cow's milk protein-based infant formula (pHF) compared to a standard intact cow's milk protein-based formula (IPF).
A double-blind, multi-center, randomized, controlled trial was performed. Healthy full-term, exclusively formula-fed infants ( = 345), aged ≤28 days were allocated to consume either a pHF ( = 173) or an IPF ( = 172) until the age of 17 weeks. The primary outcome was equivalence of weight gain (g/d) until the age of 17 weeks. The secondary outcomes were equivalence of other growth parameters, i.e., infants' weight, length, head circumference, body mass index (BMI) and anthropometric -scores, while tertiary outcomes were gut comfort, formula intake, and adverse events (AEs).
Overall, 288 infants completed the study (pHF group: 138, IPF group: 150). No differences were observed between the two groups in weight gain (g/d) during the three-months intervention [ = 0.915 for the Per Protocol (PP) population]. The 90% CI was [-1.252 to 1.100] being within the pre-defined equivalence margin of ±3.0 g/d. Similar findings were observed in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) and the sensitivity analysis. Regarding the secondary outcomes, no differences over the intervention period were shown between the two groups in both the PP and FAS analysis sets. Average -scores were in the normal range based on World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards for both groups at all time points in both analysis sets. Stool consistency, amount, and colour were different in the two groups. No differences were observed in gut comfort, stool frequency, and formula intake, between the two groups. In total 14 AEs and 22 serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported of which 15 (12%) and 1 (5%) were considered as (possibly) related to the study product, respectively.
The study demonstrates that the consumption of pHF results in adequate infant growth, equivalent to that of infants consuming IPF. Furthermore, the overall gut comfort was comparable between the two groups. Therefore, it can be concluded that the pHF is safe for and well tolerated by healthy infants.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05757323?id=NCT05757323&rank=1, identifier (NCT05757323).
本研究旨在调查与食用标准的完整牛乳蛋白配方奶粉(IPF)相比,食用部分水解牛乳蛋白配方奶粉(pHF)的健康婴儿的生长情况和肠道舒适度。
进行了一项双盲、多中心、随机对照试验。将年龄≤28天的健康足月纯配方奶粉喂养婴儿(n = 345)分为两组,分别食用pHF(n = 173)或IPF(n = 172),直至17周龄。主要结局是至17周龄时体重增加量(克/天)的等效性。次要结局是其他生长参数的等效性,即婴儿的体重、身长、头围、体重指数(BMI)和人体测量学评分,而三级结局是肠道舒适度、配方奶粉摄入量和不良事件(AE)。
总体而言,288名婴儿完成了研究(pHF组:138名,IPF组:150名)。在为期三个月的干预期间,两组之间的体重增加量(克/天)没有差异[符合方案(PP)人群的P = 0.915]。90%置信区间为[-1.252至1.100],在预先定义的±3.0克/天的等效性界限内。在全分析集(FAS)和敏感性分析中也观察到了类似的结果。关于次要结局,在PP和FAS分析集中,两组在干预期内均未显示出差异。根据世界卫生组织(WHO)生长标准,两组在两个分析集的所有时间点的平均评分均在正常范围内。两组的粪便稠度、量和颜色不同。两组在肠道舒适度、排便频率和配方奶粉摄入量方面没有差异。总共报告了14例AE和22例严重不良事件(SAE),其中分别有15例(12%)和1例(5%)被认为(可能)与研究产品有关。
该研究表明,食用pHF能使婴儿获得充足的生长,与食用IPF的婴儿相当。此外,两组的总体肠道舒适度相当。因此,可以得出结论,pHF对健康婴儿是安全的且耐受性良好。
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05757323?id=NCT05757323&rank=1,标识符(NCT05757323)