Linde Ditte S, Harakow Hawa-Idil, Jaafar Negin
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2024 May 17;22:100315. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100315. eCollection 2024 Jun.
There is lack of in-depth knowledge of how immigrants who originate from countries where female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) historically is practiced, perceive the practice after migrating to Europe. The aim of this study was to explore the attitude towards FGM/C among immigrants and descendants and the health consequences of living with FGM/C.
Qualitative methods were used in the form of semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. Female and male immigrants and descendants in Denmark from Somalia or Kurdish of Iraq/Iran participated in the study. The interview/focus group discussion guides were developed by the European Institute for Gender Equality. Purposely sampling was used, and participants were recruited by use of snowballing through gatekeepers and women's societies working within the Somali and Kurdish communities.
Sixteen persons participated in the study. No descendants had been cut, but all female immigrants had been cut prior to migrating and did not wish to pass on the practice. FGM/C was perceived as a harmful practice with severe sexual and mental health consequences. Women with Somali origin experienced that the practice was falsely associated with their origin, which led to stigmatisation. Women with Kurdish origin lacked healthcare support when suffering sexual consequences of FGM/C. It was generally perceived that the Danish healthcare system lacked cultural sensitivity.
FGM/C is negatively perceived among Somali and Kurdish immigrants and descendants in Denmark and not practiced among these groups. The Danish healthcare system should adopt a more culturally sensitive approach when addressing sexual health among immigrants and descendants. Denmark and other European countries should work towards destigmatising the immigrant communities when it comes to FGM/C. Larger European studies with primary data are needed to generalise the findings of this study.
对于那些来自历史上曾实行女性外阴残割/切割(FGM/C)的国家的移民,在移民到欧洲后如何看待这种习俗,我们缺乏深入了解。本研究的目的是探讨移民及其后代对FGM/C的态度以及遭受FGM/C带来的健康后果。
采用半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论的定性方法。丹麦的索马里或伊拉克/伊朗库尔德裔的女性和男性移民及其后代参与了研究。访谈/焦点小组讨论指南由欧洲性别平等研究所制定。采用目的抽样法,通过守门人和在索马里及库尔德社区工作的妇女团体利用滚雪球的方式招募参与者。
16人参与了研究。没有后代接受过切割,但所有女性移民在移民前都接受过切割,且不希望将这种习俗传承下去。FGM/C被视为一种有害习俗,会带来严重的性健康和心理健康后果。索马里裔女性感到这种习俗被错误地与她们的出身联系在一起,这导致了污名化。库尔德裔女性在遭受FGM/C的性健康后果时缺乏医疗保健支持。人们普遍认为丹麦的医疗保健系统缺乏文化敏感性。
在丹麦的索马里和库尔德移民及其后代中,FGM/C受到负面看待,这些群体中也不再实行这种习俗。丹麦医疗保健系统在处理移民及其后代的性健康问题时应采取更具文化敏感性的方法。丹麦和其他欧洲国家应努力消除在FGM/C问题上对移民社区的污名化。需要进行更大规模的欧洲初级数据研究来推广本研究的结果。