Suppr超能文献

荷兰女性生殖器切割估计:产科学实践全国调查与外推模型比较。

Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Netherlands: a comparison between a nationwide survey in midwifery practices and extrapolation-model.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Pharos, Dutch Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):1033. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09151-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Owing to migration, female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) has become a growing concern in host countries in which FGM/C is not familiar. There is a need for reliable estimates of FGM/C prevalence to inform medical and public health policy. We aimed to advance methodology for estimating the prevalence of FGM/C in diaspora by determining the prevalence of FGM/C among women giving birth in the Netherlands.

METHODS

Two methods were applied to estimate the prevalence of FGM/C in women giving birth: (I) direct estimation of FGM/C was performed through a nationwide survey of all midwifery practices in the Netherlands and (II) the extrapolation model was adopted for indirect estimation of FGM/C, by applying population-based-survey data on FGM/C in country of origin to migrant women who gave birth in 2018 in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

A nationwide survey among primary care midwifery practices that provided care for 57.5% of all deliveries in 2018 in the Netherlands, reported 523 cases of FGM/C, constituting FGM/C prevalence of 0.54%. The indirect estimation of FGM/C in an extrapolation-model resulted in an estimated prevalence of 1.55%. Possible reasons for the difference in FGM/C prevalence between direct- and indirect estimation include that the midwives were not being able to recognize, record or classify FGM/C, referral to an obstetrician before assessing FGM/C status of women and selective responding to the survey. Also, migrants might differ from people in their country of origin in terms of acculturation toward discontinuation of the practice. This may have contributed to the higher indirect-estimation of FGM/C compared to direct estimation of FGM/C.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study has provided insight into direct estimation of FGM/C through a survey of midwifery practices in the Netherlands. Evidence based on midwifery practices data can be regarded as a minimum benchmark for actual prevalence among the subpopulation of women who gave birth in a given year.

摘要

背景

由于移民,女性外阴残割或切割(FGM/C)在不熟悉 FGM/C 的东道国已成为一个日益严重的问题。需要可靠的 FGM/C 流行率估计值来为医疗和公共卫生政策提供信息。我们旨在通过确定在荷兰分娩的妇女中 FGM/C 的流行率来推进侨民中 FGM/C 流行率估计的方法。

方法

应用两种方法来估计在荷兰分娩的妇女中 FGM/C 的流行率:(I)通过对荷兰所有助产士实践的全国性调查直接估计 FGM/C;(II)通过应用原籍国 FGM/C 的基于人群的调查数据,采用外推模型间接估计 FGM/C,适用于 2018 年在荷兰分娩的移民妇女。

结果

在荷兰,为 2018 年所有分娩提供护理的初级保健助产实践中进行的全国性调查报告了 523 例 FGM/C,构成 FGM/C 的流行率为 0.54%。在外推模型中的间接估计导致估计的 FGM/C 流行率为 1.55%。FGM/C 直接和间接估计之间流行率差异的可能原因包括助产士无法识别、记录或分类 FGM/C、在评估妇女 FGM/C 状况之前转介给产科医生以及对调查的选择性回应。此外,移民在接受文化方面可能与原籍国的人不同,从而停止该行为。这可能导致间接估计的 FGM/C 高于直接估计的 FGM/C。

结论

本研究通过对荷兰助产士实践的调查提供了对 FGM/C 直接估计的深入了解。基于助产士实践数据的证据可以被视为给定年份分娩的妇女亚群中实际流行率的最低基准。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Missed opportunities for diagnosis of female genital mutilation.女性生殖器切割诊断的错失机会
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Jun;125(3):256-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.11.016. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验