• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将肝移植扩展至结直肠癌肝转移患者的溢出效应:离散事件模拟分析。

The Spillover Effects of Extending Liver Transplantation to Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Discrete Event Simulation Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Research group for Transplant Oncology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):529-542. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241249154. Epub 2024 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X241249154
PMID:38828508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11283734/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is an alternative treatment for patients with nonresectable colorectal cancer liver-only metastases (CRLM); however, the potential effects on wait-list time and life expectancy to other patients on the transplant waiting list have not been considered. We explored the potential effects of expanding liver transplantation eligibility to include patients with CRLM on wait-list time and life expectancy in Norway.

METHODS

We developed a discrete event simulation model to reflect the Norwegian liver transplantation waiting list process and included 2 groups: 1) patients currently eligible for liver transplantation and 2) CRLM patients. Under 2 alternative CRLM-patient transplant eligibility criteria, we simulated 2 strategies: 1) inclusion of only currently eligible patients (CRLM patients received standard-of-care palliative chemotherapy) and 2) expanding waiting list eligibility to include CRLM patients under 2 eligibility criteria. Model outcomes included median waiting list time, life expectancy, and total life-years.

RESULTS

For every additional CRLM patient listed per year, the overall median wait-list time, initially 52 d, increased by 8% to 11%. Adding 2 additional CRLM patients under the most restrictive eligibility criteria increased the CRLM patients' average life expectancy by 10.64 y and decreased the average life expectancy for currently eligible patients by 0.05 y. Under these assumptions, there was a net gain of 149.61 life-years over a 10-y programmatic period, which continued to increase under scenarios of adding 10 CRLM patients to the wait-list. Health gains were lower under less restrictive CRLM eligibility criteria. For example, adding 4 additional CRLM patients under the less restrictive eligibility criteria increased the CRLM patients' average life expectancy by 5.64 y and decreased the average life expectancy for currently eligible patients by 0.12 y. Under these assumptions, there was a net gain of 96.36 life-years over a 10-y programmatic period, which continued to increase up to 7 CRLM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model-based analysis enabled the consideration of the potential effects of enlisting Norwegian CRLM patients for liver transplantation on wait-list time and life expectancy. Enlisting CRLM patients is expected to increase the total health effects, which supports the implementation of liver transplantation for CRLM patients in Norway.

HIGHLIGHTS

Given the Norwegian donor liver availability, adding patients with nonresectable colorectal cancer liver-only metastases (CRLM) to the liver transplantation waiting list had an overall modest, but varying, impact on total waiting list time.Survival gains for selected CRLM patients treated with liver transplantation would likely outweigh the losses incurred to patients listed currently.To improve the total life-years gained in the population, Norway should consider expanding the treatment options for CRLM patients to include liver transplantation.Other countries may also have an opportunity to gain total life-years by extending the waiting list eligibility criteria; however, country-specific analyses are required.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f648/11283734/bfacc58ae3a9/10.1177_0272989X241249154-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f648/11283734/f382de8de92e/10.1177_0272989X241249154-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f648/11283734/043a741e8ae7/10.1177_0272989X241249154-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f648/11283734/bfacc58ae3a9/10.1177_0272989X241249154-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f648/11283734/f382de8de92e/10.1177_0272989X241249154-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f648/11283734/043a741e8ae7/10.1177_0272989X241249154-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f648/11283734/bfacc58ae3a9/10.1177_0272989X241249154-fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

肝移植是治疗结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)不可切除患者的一种替代治疗方法;然而,对于移植等候名单上的其他患者,肝移植对等候时间和预期寿命的潜在影响尚未得到考虑。我们探讨了在挪威扩大肝移植资格标准,将 CRLM 患者纳入等候名单对等候时间和预期寿命的潜在影响。

方法

我们开发了一个离散事件模拟模型来反映挪威肝移植等候名单的处理过程,并包括 2 组:1)目前有资格接受肝移植的患者和 2)CRLM 患者。在两种替代的 CRLM 患者移植资格标准下,我们模拟了 2 种策略:1)仅纳入目前有资格的患者(CRLM 患者接受标准的姑息性化疗)和 2)根据 2 种资格标准扩大等候名单资格,纳入 CRLM 患者。模型结果包括中位等候名单时间、预期寿命和总寿命年数。

结果

每年每增加一名 CRLM 患者,整体中位等候名单时间从最初的 52 天增加 8%至 11%。根据最严格的资格标准,增加 2 名额外的 CRLM 患者,将 CRLM 患者的平均预期寿命延长 10.64 年,并将目前有资格的患者的平均预期寿命缩短 0.05 年。根据这些假设,在 10 年的方案期间,将获得 149.61 个寿命年的净收益,并且在将 10 名 CRLM 患者列入等候名单的情况下,这一收益将继续增加。在不太严格的 CRLM 资格标准下,健康获益较低。例如,根据不太严格的资格标准,增加 4 名额外的 CRLM 患者,将 CRLM 患者的平均预期寿命延长 5.64 年,并将目前有资格的患者的平均预期寿命缩短 0.12 年。根据这些假设,在 10 年的方案期间,将获得 96.36 个寿命年的净收益,并且在增加 7 名 CRLM 患者的情况下,这一收益将继续增加。

结论

我们的基于模型的分析使人们能够考虑在挪威将 CRLM 患者纳入肝移植等候名单对等候时间和预期寿命的潜在影响。招募 CRLM 患者有望增加总体健康效果,这支持在挪威为 CRLM 患者实施肝移植。

重点

鉴于挪威供肝的可用性,将患有不可切除结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)的患者列入肝移植等候名单对总等候名单时间有一定的影响,但程度不同。对接受肝移植治疗的选定 CRLM 患者的生存获益可能超过对目前列入名单的患者的损失。为了提高人群的总寿命年数,挪威应考虑扩大 CRLM 患者的治疗选择,包括肝移植。其他国家也有可能通过扩大等候名单资格标准来获得总寿命年数;然而,需要进行特定国家的分析。

相似文献

1
The Spillover Effects of Extending Liver Transplantation to Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Discrete Event Simulation Analysis.将肝移植扩展至结直肠癌肝转移患者的溢出效应:离散事件模拟分析。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):529-542. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241249154. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
2
Liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases in patients and donors with extended criteria (SECA-II arm D study).肝移植治疗标准扩大的结直肠癌肝转移患者和供者(SECA-II 臂 D 研究)。
BJS Open. 2020 Jun;4(3):467-477. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50278. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
3
Cost-effectiveness of liver transplantation in patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver.肝移植治疗结直肠转移局限于肝脏患者的成本效益分析。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(1):132-141. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10962. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
4
Basic research supported developments of chemotherapy in nonresectable isolated colorectal liver metastases to a protocol of hepatic artery infusion using mitoxantrone, 5-FU + folinic acid and mitomycin C.基础研究推动了不可切除孤立性结直肠癌肝转移化疗的发展,形成了一种采用米托蒽醌、5-氟尿嘧啶+亚叶酸和丝裂霉素C的肝动脉灌注方案。
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1999 Feb;26(3):269-81.
5
Living donor liver transplantation for early hepatocellular carcinoma: A life-expectancy and cost-effectiveness perspective.活体供肝肝移植治疗早期肝细胞癌:从预期寿命和成本效益角度分析
Hepatology. 2001 May;33(5):1073-9. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.23311.
6
Cost effectiveness of adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma during the waiting list for liver transplantation.肝移植等待名单期间肝细胞癌辅助治疗的成本效益
Gut. 2002 Jan;50(1):123-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.1.123.
7
Expanding MELD exceptions for colorectal liver metastasis: data and policy.扩大结直肠癌肝转移 MELD 例外:数据与政策。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2024 Jun 1;29(3):195-199. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000001142. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Model to Calculate Harms and Benefits of Early vs Delayed Liver Transplantation for Patients With Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis.计算酒精性肝炎患者早期与延迟肝移植的危害与获益的模型。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Aug;157(2):472-480.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
10
Downstaging by regional chemotherapy of non-resectable isolated colorectal liver metastases.通过区域化疗对不可切除的孤立性结直肠癌肝转移进行降期治疗。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999 Aug;25(4):381-8. doi: 10.1053/ejso.1999.0661.

引用本文的文献

1
The evolving role of liver transplantation for metastatic colorectal cancer: current perspectives and future directions.肝移植在转移性结直肠癌治疗中不断演变的作用:当前观点与未来方向
Front Surg. 2025 Jul 17;12:1608467. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1608467. eCollection 2025.
2
Liver Transplantation for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases.不可切除的结直肠癌肝转移的肝移植
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:15330338251361238. doi: 10.1177/15330338251361238. Epub 2025 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Selection criteria related to long-term survival following liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastasis.结直肠癌肝转移行肝移植术后长期生存的选择标准。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Feb;20(2):530-537. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15682. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
2
Survival Following Liver Transplantation for Patients With Nonresectable Liver-only Colorectal Metastases.不可切除的单纯肝转移结直肠癌患者行肝移植术后的生存情况。
Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):212-218. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003404.
3
OPTN/SRTR 2017 Annual Data Report: Liver.OPTN/SRTR 2017 年度数据报告:肝脏。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Feb;19 Suppl 2:184-283. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15276.
4
Cost-effectiveness of liver transplantation in patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver.肝移植治疗结直肠转移局限于肝脏患者的成本效益分析。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(1):132-141. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10962. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
5
Organ distribution without geographic boundaries: A possible framework for organ allocation.打破地域限制的器官分配:器官分配的一种可能框架。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Nov;18(11):2635-2640. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15115. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
6
Waiting List Mortality and Transplant Rates for NASH Cirrhosis When Compared With Cryptogenic, Alcoholic, or AIH Cirrhosis.非酒精性脂肪性肝炎肝硬化与隐源性、酒精性或自身免疫性肝炎肝硬化相比的等待名单死亡率和移植率。
Transplantation. 2019 Jan;103(1):113-121. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002355.
7
Primary biliary cirrhosis has high wait-list mortality among patients listed for liver transplantation.原发性胆汁性肝硬化患者在等待肝移植时的死亡率很高。
Transpl Int. 2017 May;30(5):454-462. doi: 10.1111/tri.12877. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
8
Liver transplantation around the world.全球范围内的肝移植
Liver Transpl. 2016 Aug;22(8):1059-61. doi: 10.1002/lt.24508.
9
Liver transplantation in the Nordic countries - An intention to treat and post-transplant analysis from The Nordic Liver Transplant Registry 1982-2013.北欧国家的肝移植——来自北欧肝移植登记处1982 - 2013年的意向性治疗及移植后分析
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun;50(6):797-808. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1036359.
10
List and liver transplant survival according to waiting time in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌患者按等待时间划分的名单及肝移植生存率
Am J Transplant. 2015 Mar;15(3):668-77. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13011. Epub 2015 Feb 3.