Suppr超能文献

二维和三维细胞培养中抗癌药物的细胞毒性和分子差异。

Cytotoxic and molecular differences of anticancer agents on 2D and 3D cell culture.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, 17138, Jordan.

Department of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

出版信息

Mol Biol Rep. 2024 Jun 3;51(1):721. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-09669-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer and multidrug resistance are regarded as concerns related to poor health outcomes. It was found that the monolayer of 2D cancer cell cultures lacks many important features compared to Multicellular Tumor Spheroids (MCTS) or 3D cell cultures which instead have the ability to mimic more closely the in vivo tumor microenvironment. This study aimed to produce 3D cell cultures from different cancer cell lines and to examine the cytotoxic activity of anticancer medications on both 2D and 3D systems, as well as to detect alterations in the expression of certain genes levels.

METHOD

3D cell culture was produced using 3D microtissue molds. The cytotoxic activities of colchicine, cisplatin, doxorubicin, and paclitaxel were tested on 2D and 3D cell culture systems obtained from different cell lines (A549, H1299, MCF-7, and DU-145). IC50 values were determined by MTT assay. In addition, gene expression levels of PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN were evaluated by qPCR.

RESULTS

Similar cytotoxic activities were observed on both 3D and 2D cell cultures, however, higher concentrations of anticancer medications were needed for the 3D system. For instance, paclitaxel showed an IC50 of 6.234 µM and of 13.87 µM on 2D and 3D H1299 cell cultures, respectively. Gene expression of PIK3CA in H1299 cells also showed a higher fold change in 3D cell culture compared to 2D system upon treatment with doxorubicin.

CONCLUSION

When compared to 2D cell cultures, the behavior of cells in the 3D system showed to be more resistant to anticancer treatments. Due to their shape, growth pattern, hypoxic core features, interaction between cells, biomarkers synthesis, and resistance to treatment penetration, the MCTS have the advantage of better simulating the in vivo tumor conditions. As a result, it is reasonable to conclude that 3D cell cultures may be a more promising model than the traditional 2D system, offering a better understanding of the in vivo molecular changes in response to different potential treatments and multidrug resistance development.

摘要

背景

癌症和多药耐药性被认为是与不良健康结果相关的问题。研究发现,与多细胞肿瘤球体(MCTS)或 3D 细胞培养相比,2D 癌细胞培养的单层缺乏许多重要特征,因为后者能够更紧密地模拟体内肿瘤微环境。本研究旨在从不同的癌细胞系中产生 3D 细胞培养物,并研究抗癌药物在 2D 和 3D 系统上的细胞毒性活性,以及检测某些基因水平表达的变化。

方法

使用 3D 微组织模具产生 3D 细胞培养物。在从不同细胞系(A549、H1299、MCF-7 和 DU-145)获得的 2D 和 3D 细胞培养系统上测试了秋水仙碱、顺铂、多柔比星和紫杉醇的细胞毒性活性。通过 MTT 测定法确定 IC50 值。此外,通过 qPCR 评估 PIK3CA、AKT1 和 PTEN 的基因表达水平。

结果

在 3D 和 2D 细胞培养物上观察到相似的细胞毒性活性,然而,3D 系统需要更高浓度的抗癌药物。例如,紫杉醇在 2D 和 3D H1299 细胞培养物中的 IC50 值分别为 6.234 µM 和 13.87 µM。用多柔比星处理后,H1299 细胞中 PIK3CA 的基因表达在 3D 细胞培养物中也显示出比 2D 系统更高的倍数变化。

结论

与 2D 细胞培养物相比,3D 系统中细胞的行为表现出对抗癌治疗的更强抵抗力。由于其形状、生长模式、缺氧核心特征、细胞间相互作用、生物标志物合成以及对治疗穿透的抵抗力,MCTS 具有更好地模拟体内肿瘤条件的优势。因此,可以合理地得出结论,3D 细胞培养物可能比传统的 2D 系统更有前途,能够更好地理解体内分子变化,以应对不同的潜在治疗方法和多药耐药性的发展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验