Psychology and Language Sciences, UCL, London, UK
Independent Researcher, Kettering, UK.
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 3;14(6):e085879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085879.
Synthesis of the experience of women with pain from pelvic or vaginal mesh or its removal, to identify pain-related problems and to formulate psychological aspects of pain.
Systematic review and thematic analysis of qualitative studies of pain from pelvic or vaginal mesh, or mesh removal, in women over 18 years, using individual interviews, focus groups, free text, or written or oral contributions to formal enquiries.
Medline, Embase and PsycINFO, from inception to 26 April 2023.
Qualitative studies of pain and other symptoms from pelvic or vaginal mesh or its removal; adults; no language restriction.
Line-by-line coding of participant quotations and study author statements by one author to provide codes that were applied to half the studies by another author and differences resolved by discussion. Codes were grouped into subthemes and themes by both authors, then scrutinised and discussed by a focus group of mesh-injured women for omissions, emphasis and coherence. Studies were appraised using an amalgamation of the CASP and COREQ tools.
2292 search results produced 9 eligible studies, with 7-752 participants, a total of around 2000. Four recruited patients, four totally or partially from mesh advocacy groups, and two were national enquiries (UK and Australia). Four major themes were as follows: broken body, broken mind; distrust of doctors and the medical industry; broken life and keeping going-a changed future. Psychological content mainly concerned the loss of trust in medical care, leaving women unsupported in facing an uncertain future. Mesh-injured women strongly endorsed the findings.
Pain and other problems associated with pelvic mesh are profound and far-reaching for women affected. Worse, they feel subject to continued gaslighting, including denial of their mesh-related problems and dismissal of their concerns about continued mesh insertion.
CRD42022330527.
综合女性盆腔或阴道网片或其取出后疼痛的体验,以明确与疼痛相关的问题,并阐述疼痛的心理方面。
对 18 岁以上女性因盆腔或阴道网片或其取出后疼痛的定性研究进行系统性综述和主题分析,使用个体访谈、焦点小组、自由文本或书面或口头对正式查询的贡献。
从建库到 2023 年 4 月 26 日,检索 Medline、Embase 和 PsycINFO。
盆腔或阴道网片或其取出后疼痛和其他症状的定性研究;成年人;无语言限制。
一位作者逐行编码参与者引语和研究作者陈述,以提供适用于一半研究的代码,另一位作者对这些代码进行应用,并通过讨论解决差异。两位作者将代码分组为亚主题和主题,然后由一组受网片损伤的女性进行审查、讨论,以确定遗漏、重点和连贯性。使用 CASP 和 COREQ 工具的组合对研究进行评估。
2292 次搜索结果产生了 9 项符合条件的研究,共 7-752 名参与者,总计约 2000 人。其中 4 项研究招募了患者,4 项研究完全或部分来自网片倡导团体,2 项研究是国家调查(英国和澳大利亚)。四个主要主题如下:身体和精神的破碎;对医生和医疗行业的不信任;破碎的生活和继续前进——一个改变的未来。心理内容主要涉及对医疗保健的信任丧失,使女性在面对不确定的未来时得不到支持。受网片损伤的女性强烈认可这些发现。
受影响女性的盆腔网片相关疼痛及其他问题非常严重且影响深远。更糟糕的是,她们感到自己仍在遭受持续的煤气灯效应,包括否认与网片相关的问题和对继续插入网片的担忧。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022330527。