International Research Collaborative, Oral Health and Equity, School of Human Anatomy and Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Periodontol 2000. 2024 Jun;95(1):10-19. doi: 10.1111/prd.12579. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
This narrative review addresses conventional diagnostic criteria used in clinical practice to discriminate between periodontal health, gingivitis, and periodontitis. Visual examination of the color and texture of the periodontal tissues, assessment of plaque deposits, periodontal probing assessments, and diagnostic imaging enable the collation of information to make a periodontal diagnosis, followed by an appropriate treatment plan. The periodontal probe is an essential diagnostic tool to assess probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing, and the degree of furcation involvement at multirooted teeth. When clinical signs and symptoms of periodontitis are identified, diagnostic imaging enables evaluation of the level and extent of bone destruction and bone defect morphology. The diagnostic process requires clinicians who are trained to evaluate, record, and interpret these measures. This narrative review focuses on conventional clinical diagnostic parameters which, despite their limitations, are considered the current standard of care.
这篇叙述性综述探讨了临床实践中用于区分牙周健康、牙龈炎和牙周炎的常规诊断标准。通过对牙周组织的颜色和质地进行目视检查、评估牙菌斑沉积、牙周探针评估以及诊断性影像学检查,可以收集信息以做出牙周诊断,然后制定相应的治疗计划。牙周探针是评估探诊袋深度、临床附着水平、探诊出血和多根牙分叉受累程度的重要诊断工具。当识别出牙周炎的临床体征和症状时,诊断性影像学检查可评估骨破坏的程度和范围以及骨缺损形态。诊断过程需要经过培训的临床医生来评估、记录和解释这些指标。本篇叙述性综述侧重于常规临床诊断参数,尽管这些参数存在局限性,但它们仍被认为是当前的护理标准。
J Clin Periodontol. 1988-3
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019-4-10
Minerva Dent Oral Sci. 2023-10
Periodontol 2000. 1997-10
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025-6-19
World J Exp Med. 2025-6-20
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2025-1-14
J Clin Exp Dent. 2025-3-1