Samara Eleftheria, Locatelli Isabella, Tschopp Benjamin, Lutz Nicolas, Zambelli Pierre-Yves
Pediatric Orthopedic Department, Lausanne Children's Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Unisanté, Centre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Child Orthop. 2024 Mar 18;18(3):287-294. doi: 10.1177/18632521241238149. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Highly displaced proximal humeral fractures in children with low remodeling potential need to be reduced and fixed. The use of two flexible retrograde nails became the most popular fixation technique due to the excellent functional outcome, the low complication rates, and the possibility of early mobilization. A modified single retrograde technique has been suggested by the authors to address the main disadvantage of this technique, the long operative duration. The aim of this study was to compare these techniques in terms of efficacy, and clinical and radiological outcomes.
We performed a retrospective, monocentric study. Two groups of patients were defined: One was treated with the standard flexible retrograde double nail technique and the other with the modified single nail technique. The demographic and fracture characteristics were similar in both groups and the postoperative immobilization with a simple sling for 2 weeks. We compared the surgical duration for the initial fixation and hardware removal procedures. The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, the secondary displacement at 1-week follow-up, the radiological union at 6-week follow-up, and the perioperative and short-term complications were also assessed for both groups.
The surgical duration of the initial fixation procedure was significantly shorter in single nail technique group ( = 0.005). The percentage of excellent Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (0) was similar in the two groups ( = 0.98). No secondary displacement was reported for the double nail technique group. In only one patient from the single nail technique group, we detected a secondary displacement at the first week control which did not need reoperation. In both groups, fractures were healed on the 6-week radiologic control. No cases of infection, superficial skin irritation, neurological damage, or complications related to implant removal were reported in both groups.
The single nail technique of fixation proximal humeral fractures in children addresses the disadvantage of long surgical times, described until today, with the double nail technique without compromising the excellent functional and radiological short-term outcomes.
level III.
重塑潜力低的儿童肱骨近端高度移位骨折需要进行复位和固定。由于功能结果优异、并发症发生率低以及早期活动的可能性,使用两根弹性逆行髓内钉成为最受欢迎的固定技术。作者提出了一种改良的单逆行技术,以解决该技术的主要缺点——手术时间长。本研究的目的是比较这些技术在疗效、临床和影像学结果方面的差异。
我们进行了一项回顾性单中心研究。定义了两组患者:一组采用标准弹性逆行双钉技术治疗,另一组采用改良单钉技术治疗。两组的人口统计学和骨折特征相似,术后用简单吊带固定2周。我们比较了初次固定和取出内固定器械手术的持续时间。还评估了两组患者的手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾评分、1周随访时的二次移位、6周随访时的影像学愈合情况以及围手术期和短期并发症。
单钉技术组初次固定手术的持续时间明显更短(P = 0.005)。两组中手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾评分优秀(0分)的百分比相似(P = 0.98)。双钉技术组未报告二次移位情况。单钉技术组仅1例患者在第1周复查时发现二次移位,无需再次手术。两组在6周影像学检查时骨折均愈合。两组均未报告感染、浅表皮肤刺激、神经损伤或与取出植入物相关的并发症。
儿童肱骨近端骨折的单钉固定技术解决了迄今为止双钉技术所描述的手术时间长的缺点,同时不影响优异的短期功能和影像学结果。
III级。