Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Jul;40(7):1195-1202. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2363945. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
Despite pharmacological treatments for osteoarthritis (OA), more individuals are choosing medical cannabis for OA symptom management and for mitigating opioid prescriptions for OA. This systematic review examines the global evidence of medical cannabis use on OA pain and function.
The search was completed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and CINAHL within the past 10 years (2012-2022). We limited the search to English language articles. We did not include grey literature or case studies. Participant demographics included all adult individuals with OA who were using medical cannabis for OA. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework; and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. We used a narrative synthesis approach.
Overall, 7 studies were included: 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 5 observational studies. Only 1 of the 2 RCTs reported improvements in pain for cannabis users. All 5 observational studies reported an improvement in pain levels, reduction of opioid use, and/or improvement in overall OA function. Despite high risk of bias ratings and low study quality, the consensus across studies was that medical cannabis use was effective for a subgroup of individuals suffering from OA pain.
There is low quality evidence to support medical cannabis use as a substitute for primary pharmacological treatment of OA. However, this does not negate the observations that medical cannabis may provide therapeutic relief for a subset of patients.
CRD42022354026.
尽管有治疗骨关节炎(OA)的药物治疗方法,但越来越多的人选择医用大麻来治疗 OA 症状,并减少 OA 的阿片类药物处方。本系统评价检查了全球医用大麻治疗 OA 疼痛和功能的证据。
在过去 10 年(2012-2022 年)中,在 MEDLINE(PubMed)、Embase 和 CINAHL 中完成了搜索。我们将搜索范围限制在英语文章。我们不包括灰色文献或案例研究。参与者的人口统计学特征包括所有使用医用大麻治疗 OA 的成年 OA 患者。使用推荐评估、制定与评估分级(Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations)框架和干预措施非随机研究偏倚风险工具评估研究质量和偏倚风险;我们使用叙述性综合方法。
总体而言,共纳入 7 项研究:2 项随机对照试验(RCT)和 5 项观察性研究。仅 1 项 RCT 报告了大麻使用者疼痛改善。所有 5 项观察性研究均报告疼痛水平降低、阿片类药物使用减少和/或 OA 整体功能改善。尽管存在高偏倚风险评分和低研究质量,但是研究结果的共识是,医用大麻对患有 OA 疼痛的一部分人群有效。
有低质量证据支持将医用大麻作为 OA 初级药物治疗的替代方法。然而,这并不能否定医用大麻可能为一部分患者提供治疗缓解的观点。
系统评价 PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022354026。