Suppr超能文献

孤独和社会隔离对住院老年患者进行运动方案益处的影响。

The impact of loneliness and social isolation on the benefits of an exercise program with hospitalised older adults.

机构信息

Navarrabiomed, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain; CIBER of Frailty and Healthy Aging (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain; Facultad de Medicina, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Navarrabiomed, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain; CIBER of Frailty and Healthy Aging (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Nutr Health Aging. 2024 Jul;28(7):100282. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100282. Epub 2024 Jun 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the prevalence and impact of loneliness (De Jong Gierveld scale) and isolation (Lubben scale) on the effects of a hospital-based exercise programme.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial.

SETTING

Acute Geriatric Unit of a tertiary hospital in Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

103 hospitalised older adults.

INTERVENTION

Individualised multicomponent exercise program (20-minute sessions twice a day for 3 consecutive days).

RESULTS

Among the 103 randomised patients included in the analysis (both arms included), 58.3% were male, and their mean age was 87.3 (4.5) years. According to the Lubben scale, 15.8% of patients were at risk of isolation, while 62.7% were in a situation of severe or moderate loneliness according to the De Jong Gierveld scale. In the non-isolated group, training showed a substantial positive impact on Geriatric Depression Scale (B = -1.25, 95% CI = -0.24 to -0.27). In the isolated group, all outcomes improved, but only the Quality of Life showed significant changes (B = 35, 95% CI = 4.96-35.8). The SPPB test (B = 1.62, 95% CI = 0.19-3.04) and Quality of Life, (B = 17.1, 95% CI = 1.84-32.3) showed a significant improvement in the non-loneliness exercise group while no differences were found in the loneliness group.

CONCLUSION

Despite the high prevalence of loneliness and social isolation, individualised exercise programs provide significant benefits to hospitalised patients, especially in quality of life.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估孤独感(德容氏孤独量表)和隔离感(卢本量表)对基于医院的运动方案效果的影响。

设计

随机临床试验的二次分析。

地点

西班牙一家三级医院的急性老年病房。

参与者

103 名住院老年患者。

干预

个体化多组分运动方案(每天两次,每次 20 分钟,连续 3 天)。

结果

在纳入分析的 103 名随机患者(包括两组)中,58.3%为男性,平均年龄为 87.3(4.5)岁。根据卢本量表,15.8%的患者存在隔离风险,而根据德容氏孤独量表,62.7%的患者处于严重或中度孤独状态。在非隔离组中,训练对老年抑郁量表(B = -1.25,95%置信区间= -0.24 至-0.27)有显著的积极影响。在隔离组中,所有结果均有所改善,但只有生活质量有显著变化(B = 35,95%置信区间= 4.96-35.8)。SPPB 测试(B = 1.62,95%置信区间= 0.19-3.04)和生活质量(B = 17.1,95%置信区间= 1.84-32.3)在非孤独运动组中显示出显著改善,而在孤独组中则没有差异。

结论

尽管孤独感和社会隔离感普遍存在,但个体化运动方案为住院患者提供了显著益处,特别是在生活质量方面。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验