School of Life & Environmental Science, Guangxi Colleges and Universities Key Laboratory of Biomedical Sensors and Intelligent Instruments, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, Guangxi, PR China.
Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
Radiother Oncol. 2024 Aug;197:110367. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110367. Epub 2024 Jun 2.
The number of metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) is crucial for the survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but manual counting is laborious. This study aims to explore the feasibility and prognostic value of automatic MLNs segmentation and counting.
We retrospectively enrolled 980 newly diagnosed patients in the primary cohort and 224 patients from two external cohorts. We utilized the nnUnet model for automatic MLNs segmentation on multimodal magnetic resonance imaging. MLNs counting methods, including manual delineation-assisted counting (MDAC) and fully automatic lymph node counting system (AMLNC), were compared with manual evaluation (Gold standard).
In the internal validation group, the MLNs segmentation results showed acceptable agreement with manual delineation, with a mean Dice coefficient of 0.771. The consistency among three counting methods was as follows 0.778 (Gold vs. AMLNC), 0.638 (Gold vs. MDAC), and 0.739 (AMLNC vs. MDAC). MLNs numbers were categorized into three-category variable (1-4, 5-9, > 9) and two-category variable (<4, ≥ 4) based on the gold standard and AMLNC. These categorical variables demonstrated acceptable discriminating abilities for 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free, and distant metastasis-free survival. Compared with base prediction model, the model incorporating two-category AMLNC-counting numbers showed improved C-indexes for 5-year OS prediction (0.658 vs. 0.675, P = 0.045). All results have been successfully validated in the external cohort.
The AMLNC system offers a time- and labor-saving approach for fully automatic MLNs segmentation and counting in NPC. MLNs counting using AMLNC demonstrated non-inferior performance in survival discrimination compared to manual detection.
转移淋巴结(MLNs)的数量对鼻咽癌(NPC)的生存至关重要,但手动计数非常繁琐。本研究旨在探讨自动 MLNs 分割和计数的可行性和预后价值。
我们回顾性地纳入了原发性队列中的 980 名新诊断患者和两个外部队列中的 224 名患者。我们利用 nnUnet 模型对多模态磁共振成像进行自动 MLNs 分割。MLNs 计数方法包括手动描绘辅助计数(MDAC)和全自动淋巴结计数系统(AMLNC),并与手动评估(金标准)进行比较。
在内部验证组中,MLNs 分割结果与手动描绘具有可接受的一致性,平均 Dice 系数为 0.771。三种计数方法的一致性如下:0.778(金标准与 AMLNC)、0.638(金标准与 MDAC)和 0.739(AMLNC 与 MDAC)。根据金标准和 AMLNC,MLNs 数量被分为三类变量(1-4、5-9、>9)和两类变量(<4、≥4)。这些分类变量对 5 年总生存率(OS)、无进展生存率和无远处转移生存率具有可接受的区分能力。与基础预测模型相比,纳入二类 AMLNC 计数的模型对 5 年 OS 预测的 C 指数有所提高(0.658 比 0.675,P=0.045)。所有结果均在外部队列中得到成功验证。
AMLNC 系统为 NPC 中自动 MLNs 分割和计数提供了一种省时省力的方法。AMLNC 计数在生存判别方面的表现不劣于手动检测。