• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微轴流泵临时心室辅助装置经腋窝入路用于心源性休克时的炎症和溶血反应

Inflammatory and Hemolytic Responses of Microaxial Flow Pump Temporary Ventricular Assist Devices via Axillary Access in Cardiogenic Shock.

作者信息

Schmack Leonie, Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh Sadeq, Weymann Alexander, Pizanis Nikolaus, Akhyari Payam, Zubarevich Alina, Hanke Jasmin Sarah, Popov Aron-Frederik, Ruhparwar Arjang, Rassaf Tienush, Kamler Markus, Luedike Peter, Schmack Bastian

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45141 Essen, Germany.

Klinikum Region Hannover, Klinikum Siloah, Klinik für Kardiologie, Rhythmologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Stadionbrücke 4, 30459 Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Nov 28;60(12):1960. doi: 10.3390/medicina60121960.

DOI:10.3390/medicina60121960
PMID:39768841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11677742/
Abstract

The use of temporary left ventricular assist devices (tLVADs) for patients suffering from cardiogenic shock (CS) is becoming more common. This study examines the indications and outcomes of microaxial flow pumps (Impella, Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) when cannulated through the axillary artery in patients with severe CS, with a particular focus on acute phase reactions and hemolytic responses. This single-center, retrospective cohort involved patients who received microaxial Impella implantation via the axillary artery from 2020 to 2022 ( = 47). Among the patients, 66% (N = 31 cases) were treated with the Impella 5.5, 25.5% (N = 12 cases) with the Impella 5.0, and 8.5% (N = 4 cases) with the Impella CP. Additionally, 28% were managed using the ECMELLA concept. The mean length of time for Impella support was 8 days. The overall 30-day survival rate was 78%, with no significant differences observed between the ECMELLA group and the various Impella types. At 30 days post-therapy, 47% of survivors no longer required mechanical support, while 26% were upgraded to a durable LVAD. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels were significantly lower in patients receiving Impella 5.5 ( = 17 vs. 12) immediately following implantation ( = 0.03) compared with those with smaller devices. Haptoglobin levels were significantly higher in the Impella 5.5 group ( = 17 vs. 11, = 0.02), with overall lower rates of hemolysis (45.1%, < 0.01). The mortality rate in critical CS appears reduced with axillary artery implantation of Impella devices relative to existing literature. A full-flow microaxial pump (Impella 5.5) seems advantageous regarding systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and acute hemolysis, indicated by lower IL-6 and higher haptoglobin levels, compared with smaller Impella devices. A tailored escalation/de-escalation concept using axillary access for different mAFP types appears feasible and safe.

摘要

对于心源性休克(CS)患者使用临时左心室辅助装置(tLVADs)正变得越来越普遍。本研究探讨了微轴流泵(美国马萨诸塞州丹弗斯市Abiomed公司的Impella)经腋动脉插管用于重症CS患者的适应证和结局,特别关注急性期反应和溶血反应。这项单中心回顾性队列研究纳入了2020年至2022年期间经腋动脉接受微轴流Impella植入的患者(n = 47)。在这些患者中,66%(n = 31例)接受了Impella 5.5治疗,25.5%(n = 12例)接受了Impella 5.0治疗,8.5%(n = 4例)接受了Impella CP治疗。此外,28%的患者采用了ECMELLA概念进行治疗。Impella支持的平均时长为8天。总体30天生存率为78%,ECMELLA组与不同类型的Impella之间未观察到显著差异。治疗后30天时,47%的幸存者不再需要机械支持,而26%的患者升级为永久性左心室辅助装置。与使用较小装置的患者相比,接受Impella 5.5治疗的患者(n = 17 vs. 12)植入后即刻白细胞介素-6(IL-6)水平显著更低(P = 0.03)。Impella 5.5组的触珠蛋白水平显著更高(n = 17 vs. 11,P = 0.02),总体溶血发生率更低(45.1%,P < 0.01)。相对于现有文献,经腋动脉植入Impella装置似乎可降低重症CS的死亡率。与较小的Impella装置相比,全流量微轴流泵(Impella 5.5)在全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)和急性溶血方面似乎具有优势,表现为IL-6水平更低和触珠蛋白水平更高。对于不同类型的微轴流泵采用经腋入路进行量身定制的升级/降级概念似乎是可行且安全的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e332/11677742/348fea65ef45/medicina-60-01960-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e332/11677742/7ed3e09d58f1/medicina-60-01960-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e332/11677742/680accd33b18/medicina-60-01960-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e332/11677742/f7d47370f4ee/medicina-60-01960-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e332/11677742/348fea65ef45/medicina-60-01960-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e332/11677742/7ed3e09d58f1/medicina-60-01960-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e332/11677742/680accd33b18/medicina-60-01960-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e332/11677742/f7d47370f4ee/medicina-60-01960-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e332/11677742/348fea65ef45/medicina-60-01960-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Inflammatory and Hemolytic Responses of Microaxial Flow Pump Temporary Ventricular Assist Devices via Axillary Access in Cardiogenic Shock.微轴流泵临时心室辅助装置经腋窝入路用于心源性休克时的炎症和溶血反应
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Nov 28;60(12):1960. doi: 10.3390/medicina60121960.
2
Clinical outcomes among cardiogenic shock patients supported with high-capacity Impella axial flow pumps: A report from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group.高容量 Impella 轴流泵支持下心源性休克患者的临床结局:心源性休克工作组的报告。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Sep;43(9):1478-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.05.015. Epub 2024 Jun 2.
3
The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock.腋动脉置入Impella 5.0装置在急性心源性休克患者中的作用。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 14;15(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01251-7.
4
Impella 5.0 Support in INTERMACS II Cardiogenic Shock Patients Using Right and Left Axillary Artery Access.在使用左右腋动脉入路的INTERMACS II级心源性休克患者中使用Impella 5.0支持
Artif Organs. 2015 Aug;39(8):660-3. doi: 10.1111/aor.12529. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
5
Right Axillary Artery Conduit Is a Safe and Reliable Access for Implantation of Impella 5.0 Microaxial Pump.右腋动脉导管是用于植入Impella 5.0微轴流泵的安全可靠的入路。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;54:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
6
Impella - Current issues and future expectations for the percutaneous, microaxial flow left ventricular assist device.Impella - 经皮微轴流左心室辅助装置的当前问题和未来期望。
J Cardiol. 2024 Apr;83(4):228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
7
Short-term mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 device for cardiogenic shock at La Pitié-Salpêtrière.在拉皮提耶尔-萨尔佩特里埃医院使用Impella 5.0设备对心源性休克进行短期机械循环支持。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Feb;6(1):87-92. doi: 10.1177/2048872616633877. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
8
Percutaneous Transvalvular Microaxial Flow Pump Support in Cardiology.经皮跨瓣微轴流泵支持在心脏病学中的应用。
Circulation. 2022 Apr 19;145(16):1254-1284. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058229. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
9
Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微型轴流左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用与院内死亡率和大出血的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
10
Propensity score-based analysis of 30-day survival in cardiogenic shock patients supported with different microaxial left ventricular assist devices.基于倾向性评分的不同微型轴流左心室辅助装置支持下心源性休克患者 30 天生存率的分析。
J Card Surg. 2021 Nov;36(11):4141-4152. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15932. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.体外生命支持在与梗死相关的心原性休克中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 5;389(14):1286-1297. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307227. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
2
Short-term mechanical support with the Impella 5.x for mitral valve surgery in advanced heart failure-protected cardiac surgery.在晚期心力衰竭患者二尖瓣手术中使用Impella 5.x进行短期机械支持——心脏保护手术。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 11;10:1229336. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1229336. eCollection 2023.
3
Central extracorporeal circulatory life support (cECLS) in selected patients with critical cardiogenic shock.
对部分重症心源性休克患者实施体外循环生命支持(cECLS)。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Apr 17;10:1142953. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1142953. eCollection 2023.
4
Early experience with the Impella pump: Single-center registry.《Impella 泵的早期经验:单中心注册研究》
Artif Organs. 2022 Aug;46(8):1689-1694. doi: 10.1111/aor.14245. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
5
Risk of Stroke with Impella Placement Is Not Associated with Access Vessel.带 Impella 装置的中风风险与入路血管无关。
Innovations (Phila). 2022 Jan-Feb;17(1):25-29. doi: 10.1177/15569845211057818. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
6
2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.2021年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368.
7
Joint EAPCI/ACVC expert consensus document on percutaneous ventricular assist devices.经皮心室辅助装置的 EAPCI/ACVC 专家共识文件
EuroIntervention. 2021 Jul 20;17(4):e274-e286. doi: 10.4244/EIJY21M05_01.
8
Short term outcomes of Impella in cardiogenic shock: A review and meta-analysis of observational studies.经皮左心室辅助装置在心源性休克患者中的短期预后:观察性研究的回顾性分析和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;324:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.09.044. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
9
ECMELLA 2.0: Single Arterial Access Technique for a Staged Approach in Cardiogenic Shock.ECMELLA 2.0:心原性休克分期治疗中单动脉入路技术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Feb;111(2):e135-e137. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.084. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
10
Epidemiology, pathophysiology and contemporary management of cardiogenic shock - a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.心源性休克的流行病学、病理生理学和当代治疗 - 欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会立场声明。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Aug;22(8):1315-1341. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1922. Epub 2020 Jul 16.