Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Center for Musculoskeletal Innovative Research and Advancement (C-MiRA), Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 4;14(1):12846. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62792-8.
Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is often managed surgically. Enzymatic chemonucleolysis emerged as a non-surgical alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of chemonucleolytic enzymes for LDH. The primary objective is to evaluate efficacy through "treatment success" (i.e., pain reduction) and severe adverse events (SAEs) rates. Additionally, differences in efficacy and safety trends among chemonucleolytic enzymes are explored. Following our PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42023451546) and PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted up to July 18, 2023. Inclusion criteria involved human LDH treatment with enzymatic chemonucleolysis reagents, assessing pain alleviation, imaging changes, and reporting on SAEs, with focus on allergic reactions. Quality assessment employed the Cochrane Source of Bias and MINORS tools. Meta-analysis utilized odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Among 62 included studies (12,368 patients), chemonucleolysis demonstrated an 79% treatment success rate and significantly outperformed placebo controls (OR 3.35, 95% CI 2.41-4.65) and scored similar to surgical interventions (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.20-2.10). SAEs occurred in 1.4% of cases, with slightly higher rates in chymopapain cohorts. No significant differences in "proceeding to surgery" rates were observed between chemonucleolysis and control cohorts. Limitations include dated and heterogeneous studies, emphasizing the need for higher-quality trials. Further optimization through careful patient selection and advances in therapy implementation may further enhance outcomes. The observed benefits call for wider clinical exploration and adoption. No funding was received for this review.
腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)常采用手术治疗。化学髓核溶解术作为一种非手术治疗方法应运而生。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估化学溶核酶治疗 LDH 的疗效和安全性。主要目的是通过“治疗成功”(即疼痛减轻)和严重不良事件(SAE)发生率来评估疗效。此外,还探讨了不同化学溶核酶在疗效和安全性趋势方面的差异。本研究按照我们的 PROSPERO 注册方案(CRD42023451546)和 PRISMA 指南,对 PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库进行了系统检索,检索时间截至 2023 年 7 月 18 日。纳入标准为采用酶化学髓核溶解试剂治疗人类 LDH,评估疼痛缓解、影像学变化,并报告 SAE,重点关注过敏反应。质量评估采用 Cochrane 偏倚来源和 MINORS 工具。Meta 分析采用比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。在纳入的 62 项研究(12368 例患者)中,化学髓核溶解术的治疗成功率为 79%,明显优于安慰剂对照组(OR 3.35,95%CI 2.41-4.65),与手术干预相当(OR 0.65,95%CI 0.20-2.10)。SAE 发生率为 1.4%,其中木瓜凝乳蛋白酶组略高。化学溶核术与对照组之间的“继续手术”率无显著差异。研究存在年代久远且异质性较大的局限性,强调需要开展高质量的试验。通过仔细的患者选择和治疗实施的进展进行进一步优化,可能会进一步提高疗效。观察到的益处需要更广泛的临床探索和应用。本研究无资金支持。