Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2024 Jul 1;44(6):e549-e554. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002689. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
EOSQ-24 is a parent proxy questionnaire designed to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients during their childhood years. EOSQ-SELF, a novel self-reported questionnaire, assesses HRQoL in older children (>8 y) and adolescents. So far, the same group of EOS patients has not been evaluated with both EOSQ-24 and EOSQ-SELF. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the same pathology was reflected in the parent and patient at different time points by comparing the answers to the common questions between EOSQ-24 and EOSQ-SELF.
A group of otherwise healthy EOS patients whose parents filled out EOSQ-24 at the early phase of growth-friendly treatment was re-tested by the EOSQ-SELF questionnaire at the end of treatment. Both EOSQ-24 and EOSQ-SELF are validated in Turkish. Inclusion criteria were patients with EOS, independent ambulation, age of 8 years or older at EOSQ-SELF enrollment, literacy in Turkish, no apparent intellectual impairment, and a minimum of 24 months after graduation. The common questions between the 2 surveys with nearly identical phrasings were extracted. Common items from the 2 tests were compared with a Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Twenty-one patients (15 females, 6 males) who previously filled out EOSQ-24 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the group was 10 (5 to 16) years at EOSQ-24 participation and 18 (13 to 24) at the final analysis. Fourteen questions were found common in 10 domains. The scores were significantly different in 5 questions of 4 domains. EOSQ-SELF had significantly less favorable scores in the pain/discomfort, pulmonary function, and fatigue/energy level domains. Scores in the parental burden/relationships domain were significantly higher (P<0.05).
The self-reported group had a general trend of worse results. Parents and caregivers may not accurately perceive the problems of EOS patients. Our findings indicate a disconnect between caregivers and the patients, as both parties underreported the other side in some domains. These findings suggest the challenges faced by EOS patients are not adequately reflected on proxy questionnaires that assess the HRQoL of children.
Diagnostic Level I.
EOSQ-24 是一种家长代理问卷,旨在评估儿童期早发性脊柱侧凸 (EOS) 患者的健康相关生活质量 (HRQoL)。EOSQ-SELF 是一种新的自我报告问卷,用于评估年龄较大的儿童 (>8 岁) 和青少年的 HRQoL。到目前为止,同一组 EOS 患者尚未同时使用 EOSQ-24 和 EOSQ-SELF 进行评估。本研究的目的是通过比较 EOSQ-24 和 EOSQ-SELF 中常见问题的答案,来评估同一病理学在不同时间点如何在家长和患者中体现。
一组其他健康的 EOS 患者,其父母在生长友好型治疗的早期阶段填写了 EOSQ-24,在治疗结束时用 EOSQ-SELF 问卷重新进行了测试。EOSQ-24 和 EOSQ-SELF 均在土耳其语中得到验证。纳入标准为 EOS 患者、独立行走、EOSQ-SELF 入组时年龄为 8 岁或以上、土耳其语读写能力、无明显智力障碍、并在毕业后至少 24 个月。提取了两个调查中几乎相同措辞的共同问题。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较两个测试的共同项目。
21 名患者(15 名女性,6 名男性)之前填写了 EOSQ-24,符合纳入标准。该组的平均年龄为 EOSQ-24 参与时的 10 岁(5 至 16 岁),最终分析时为 18 岁(13 至 24 岁)。在 10 个领域中发现了 14 个共同问题。在 4 个领域的 5 个问题中,评分存在显著差异。EOSQ-SELF 在疼痛/不适、肺功能和疲劳/能量水平领域的评分明显较差。父母负担/关系领域的评分明显较高(P<0.05)。
自我报告组的结果总体趋势较差。父母和照顾者可能无法准确感知 EOS 患者的问题。我们的发现表明,照顾者和患者之间存在脱节,因为双方在某些领域都低估了对方。这些发现表明,评估儿童 HRQoL 的代理问卷未能充分反映 EOS 患者面临的挑战。
诊断水平 I。