Dryhurst David, Aydin Abdullatif, Nkwam Nkwam
Urology, Princess Royal University Hospital, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Urology, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Jun 2;16(6):e61552. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61552. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Introduction A transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TPB) under local anaesthetics (LA) after a prostate MRI scan is the gold standard for performing a prostate biopsy in patients with suspected prostate cancer. It has superseded transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSB). Historically, TRUSB by definition was performed in a contaminated environment and was routinely covered with antibiotics to reduce the risks of infection. Despite this, the rate of post-biopsy urosepsis has been documented to be as high as 5% in some series. In the transition from TRUSB to the establishment of a TPB under LA service in our unit, we continued to use a single dose of oral antibiotics for all patients attending for biopsy. The aim of this study is to establish whether the use of single-dose antibiotics has any effect on morbidity rates post-TPB. Methods A retrospective analysis of complications was carried out on 326 consecutive patients, who underwent TPB over a six-month period. One cohort of patients were biopsied with no antibiotic cover (n=149, 45.7%) as compared to another cohort who were given a single dose of oral antibiotics (n=177, 54.3%). Those patients in the group receiving antibiotics received either a single dose of co-amoxiclav or a single dose of ciprofloxacin. Patients with indwelling urethral catheters or with a urinary tract infection (UTI) were excluded from the analyses. All patients were followed- up after a multidisciplinary team meeting discussion (MDT) with either a telephone or a face-to-face consultation. Results A total of 324 (99.4%) patients did not report post-procedural complications. Two patients from the antibiotic group presented with infectious complications (1.1%); one patient was admitted with a prostate abscess and required drainage under general anaesthesia, and another was admitted with urosepsis requiring intravenous antibiotics. In the group who did not receive antibiotics, there were no complications reported, which was not significantly different compared to the antibiotic group (p=0.50). Conclusion Our results demonstrate that the routine use of single-dose antibiotics with TPB does not affect morbidity rates. On the basis of this investigation, we have now stopped using routine antibiotic cover for patients undergoing an LA TPB.
在前列腺MRI扫描后,于局部麻醉下进行经会阴超声引导前列腺穿刺活检(TPB)是疑似前列腺癌患者进行前列腺穿刺活检的金标准。它已取代经直肠超声引导前列腺穿刺活检(TRUSB)。从历史上看,TRUSB在定义上是在污染环境中进行的,并且常规使用抗生素以降低感染风险。尽管如此,在一些系列研究中,活检后尿脓毒症的发生率已被记录高达5%。在我们单位从TRUSB过渡到建立局部麻醉下TPB服务的过程中,我们继续对所有前来进行活检的患者使用单剂量口服抗生素。本研究的目的是确定单剂量抗生素的使用是否对TPB后的发病率有任何影响。
对连续6个月内接受TPB的326例患者的并发症进行回顾性分析。一组患者在无抗生素覆盖的情况下进行活检(n = 149,45.7%),另一组患者给予单剂量口服抗生素(n = 177,54.3%)。接受抗生素治疗的患者接受单剂量的阿莫西林克拉维酸钾或单剂量的环丙沙星。留置尿道导管或患有尿路感染(UTI)的患者被排除在分析之外。所有患者在多学科团队会议讨论(MDT)后通过电话或面对面咨询进行随访。
共有324例(99.4%)患者未报告术后并发症。抗生素组有2例患者出现感染并发症(1.1%);1例患者因前列腺脓肿入院,需要在全身麻醉下进行引流,另1例患者因尿脓毒症入院,需要静脉使用抗生素。在未接受抗生素治疗的组中,未报告并发症,与抗生素组相比无显著差异(p = 0.50)。
我们的结果表明,TPB常规使用单剂量抗生素不会影响发病率。基于这项调查,我们现在已停止对接受局部麻醉TPB的患者使用常规抗生素覆盖。