Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 May 21;14:1388385. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1388385. eCollection 2024.
This study aimed to determine whether combined of pathogen detection strategies, including specimen acquisition, culture conditions, and molecular diagnostics, can improve treatment outcomes in patients with periprosthetic joint infections (PJI).
This retrospective study included suspected PJI cases from three sequential stages at our institution: Stage A (July 2012 to June 2015), Stage B (July 2015 to June 2018), and Stage C (July 2018 to June 2021). Cases were categorized into PJI and aseptic failure (AF) groups based on European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. Utilization of pathogen diagnostic strategies, pathogen detection rates, targeted antibiotic prescription rates, and treatment outcomes were analyzed and compared across the three stages.
A total of 165 PJI cases and 38 AF cases were included in this study. With the progressive implementation of the three optimization approaches across stages A, B and C, pathogen detection rates exhibited a gradual increase (χ2 = 8.282, P=0.016). Similarly, utilization of targeted antibiotic therapy increased stepwise from 57.1% in Stage A, to 82.3% in Stage B, and to 84% in Stage C (χ2 = 9.515, P=0.009). The 2-year infection control rate exceeded 90% in both stages B and C, surpassing stage A (71.4%) (χ2 = 8.317, P=0.011). Combined application of all three optimized protocols yielded the highest sensitivity of 91.21% for pathogen detection, while retaining higher specificity of 92.11%.
The utilization of combined pathogen diagnostic strategies in PJI can increase pathogen detection rates, improve targeted antibiotic prescription, reduce the occurrence of antibiotic complications, and achieve better treatment outcomes.
本研究旨在确定包括标本采集、培养条件和分子诊断在内的病原体检测策略的联合应用是否能改善假体周围关节感染(PJI)患者的治疗效果。
本回顾性研究纳入了我院三个连续阶段的疑似 PJI 病例:阶段 A(2012 年 7 月至 2015 年 6 月)、阶段 B(2015 年 7 月至 2018 年 6 月)和阶段 C(2018 年 7 月至 2021 年 6 月)。根据欧洲骨与关节感染学会(EBJIS)标准,病例分为 PJI 组和无菌性失败(AF)组。分析和比较了三个阶段的病原体诊断策略的利用、病原体检测率、靶向抗生素处方率和治疗效果。
本研究共纳入 165 例 PJI 病例和 38 例 AF 病例。随着三个优化方法在阶段 A、B 和 C 的逐步实施,病原体检测率逐渐增加(χ2=8.282,P=0.016)。同样,靶向抗生素治疗的使用率也逐渐增加,从阶段 A 的 57.1%增加到阶段 B 的 82.3%,再增加到阶段 C 的 84%(χ2=9.515,P=0.009)。阶段 B 和 C 的 2 年感染控制率均超过 90%,超过了阶段 A(71.4%)(χ2=8.317,P=0.011)。联合应用所有三种优化方案的病原体检测敏感性最高,为 91.21%,同时保持了较高的特异性,为 92.11%。
在 PJI 中应用联合病原体诊断策略可以提高病原体检测率,改善靶向抗生素处方,减少抗生素并发症的发生,从而获得更好的治疗效果。