Suppr超能文献

非糖甜味剂的风险和益处:观察性研究和随机对照试验之间相互矛盾的证据。

Risks and benefits of nonsugar sweeteners: conflicting evidence between observational studies and randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Health Department, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern.

Division of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2024 Jul 1;27(4):344-349. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000001048. Epub 2024 May 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recommendations on the use of nonsugar sweeteners are contradictory, even if they come from official sources. The aim is to review and discuss recent findings on the potential impact of nonsugar sweeteners on human health.

RECENT FINDINGS

While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with short duration and risk factors endpoints mostly show favourable effects on body weight and cardiometabolic parameters when nonsugar sweeteners are used to replaced sugar-sweetened products, observational studies mostly show a positive association between the consumption of nonsugar sweeteners and cardiometabolic diseases. The conflicting results may be explained by the heterogenous nature of nonsugar sweeteners but also likely is a consequence of serious weaknesses of available studies.

SUMMARY

For more evidence-based recommendations for practice and policy, scientifically sound studies with long follow-up are required.

摘要

目的综述

关于非糖甜味剂使用的建议相互矛盾,即使它们来自官方来源。目的是综述和讨论非糖甜味剂对人类健康潜在影响的最新发现。

最近的发现

虽然短期随机对照试验 (RCT) 和风险因素终点大多表明,用非糖甜味剂替代含糖产品对体重和心血管代谢参数有有利影响,但观察性研究大多表明,非糖甜味剂的消费与心血管代谢疾病之间存在正相关关系。这种相互矛盾的结果可能是由于非糖甜味剂的异质性,但也可能是由于现有研究存在严重缺陷的结果。

总结

需要进行具有长期随访的科学合理的研究,为实践和政策提供更具循证依据的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验