WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Pharmacoeconomics Department, Gesundheit Österreich (GÖG/Austrian National Public Health Institute), 1010, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Sep;22(5):629-652. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00888-y. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
Fostering market entry of novel antibiotics and enhanced use of diagnostics to improve the quality of antibiotic prescribing are avenues to tackle antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which is a major public health threat. Pricing, procurement and reimbursement policies may work as AMR 'pull incentives' to support these objectives. This paper studies pull incentives in pricing, procurement and reimbursement policies (e.g., additions to, modifications of, and exemptions from standard policies) for novel antibiotics, diagnostics and health products with a similar profile in 10 study countries. It also explores whether incentives for non-AMR health products could be transferred to AMR health products.
This research included a review of policies in 10 G20 countries based on literature and unpublished documents, and the production of country fact sheets that were validated by country experts. Initial research was conducted in 2020 and updated in 2023.
Identified pull incentives in pricing policies include free pricing, higher prices at launch and price increases over time, managed-entry agreements, and waiving or reducing mandatory discounts. Incentives in procurement comprise value-based procurement, pooled procurement and models that delink prices from volumes (subscription-based schemes), whereas incentives in reimbursement include lower evidence requirements for inclusion in the reimbursement scheme, accelerated reimbursement processes, separate budgets that offer add-on funding, and adapted prescribing conditions.
While a few pull incentives have been piloted or implemented for antibiotics in recent years, these mechanisms have been mainly used to incentivize launch of certain non-AMR health products, such as orphan medicines. Given similarities in their product characteristics, transferability of some of these pull incentives appears to be possible; however, it would be essential to conduct impact assessments of these incentives. Trade-offs between incentives to foster market entry and thus potentially improve access and the financial sustainability for payers need to be addressed.
促进新型抗生素进入市场并加强诊断的使用以提高抗生素处方质量是应对抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的途径,这是一个主要的公共卫生威胁。定价、采购和报销政策可以作为 AMR 的“拉动激励”,以支持这些目标。本文研究了 10 个研究国家中新型抗生素、诊断和具有类似特征的卫生产品的定价、采购和报销政策(例如,标准政策的补充、修改和豁免)中的拉动激励措施。它还探讨了非 AMR 卫生产品的激励措施是否可以转移到 AMR 卫生产品上。
本研究包括基于文献和未公开文件对 10 个 G20 国家政策的审查,以及由国家专家验证的国家情况说明书的编制。初步研究于 2020 年进行,并于 2023 年进行了更新。
定价政策中确定的拉动激励措施包括免费定价、上市初期的高价和随着时间的推移价格上涨、管理准入协议以及免除或降低强制性折扣。采购激励措施包括基于价值的采购、集中采购和与数量脱钩的定价模式(基于订阅的计划),而报销激励措施包括纳入报销计划的证据要求较低、报销程序加快、提供附加资金的单独预算以及适应的处方条件。
尽管近年来针对抗生素试点或实施了一些拉动激励措施,但这些机制主要用于激励某些非 AMR 卫生产品的推出,例如孤儿药。鉴于它们的产品特征相似,这些拉动激励措施中的一些似乎可以转移;然而,对这些激励措施进行影响评估是至关重要的。需要解决促进市场进入的激励措施与支付方潜在改善获得途径和财务可持续性之间的权衡。