Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Radiol Phys Technol. 2024 Sep;17(3):658-665. doi: 10.1007/s12194-024-00817-7. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
Changing a window width (WW) alters appearance of noise and contrast of CT images. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of adjusted WW for deep learning reconstruction (DLR) in detecting hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) on CT with DLR. This retrospective study included thirty-five patients who underwent abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. DLR was used to reconstruct arterial, portal, and delayed phase images. The investigation of the optimal WW involved two blinded readers. Then, five other blinded readers independently read the image sets for detection of HCCs and evaluation of image quality with optimal or conventional liver WW. The optimal WW for detection of HCC was 119 (rounded to 120 in the subsequent analyses) Hounsfield unit (HU), which was the average of adjusted WW in the arterial, portal, and delayed phases. The average figures of merit for the readers for the jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis to detect HCC were 0.809 (reader 1/2/3/4/5, 0.765/0.798/0.892/0.764/0.827) in the optimal WW (120 HU) and 0.765 (reader 1/2/3/4/5, 0.707/0.769/0.838/0.720/0.791) in the conventional WW (150 HU), and statistically significant difference was observed between them (p < 0.001). Image quality in the optimal WW was superior to those in the conventional WW, and significant difference was seen for some readers (p < 0.041). The optimal WW for detection of HCC was narrower than conventional WW on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT with DLR. Compared with the conventional liver WW, optimal liver WW significantly improved detection performance of HCC.
改变窗宽(WW)会改变 CT 图像的噪声和对比度外观。本研究旨在探讨深度学习重建(DLR)调整 WW 对 DLR 检测 CT 肝癌(HCC)的影响。这项回顾性研究纳入了 35 名接受腹部动态对比增强 CT 的患者。使用 DLR 重建动脉、门脉和延迟期图像。最佳 WW 的调查涉及两名盲法读者。然后,另外五名盲法读者独立阅读图像集,以检测 HCC 并评估使用最佳或常规肝 WW 的图像质量。检测 HCC 的最佳 WW 为 119(后续分析中舍入为 120)HU,这是动脉、门脉和延迟期调整 WW 的平均值。读者对 HCC 检测的 Jackknife 替代自由响应接收者操作特性分析的平均性能指标在最佳 WW(120 HU)中为 0.809(读者 1/2/3/4/5,0.765/0.798/0.892/0.764/0.827),在常规 WW(150 HU)中为 0.765(读者 1/2/3/4/5,0.707/0.769/0.838/0.720/0.791),两者之间存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001)。最佳 WW 的图像质量优于常规 WW,一些读者的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.041)。与常规 WW 相比,DLR 动态增强 CT 上 HCC 的最佳 WW 更窄。与常规肝 WW 相比,最佳肝 WW 显著提高了 HCC 的检测性能。