Suppr超能文献

普萘洛尔联合维拉帕米、硝苯地平及地尔硫䓬治疗劳力性心绞痛的临床及血流动力学评估:一项安慰剂对照、双盲、随机、交叉研究

Clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of propranolol in combination with verapamil, nifedipine and diltiazem in exertional angina pectoris: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, crossover study.

作者信息

Johnston D L, Lesoway R, Humen D P, Kostuk W J

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1985 Mar 1;55(6):680-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90136-5.

Abstract

The clinical and hemodynamic effects of propranolol, propranolol-verapamil (P-V), propranolol-nifedipine (P-N) and propranolol-diltiazem (P-D) were studied in 19 patients with chronic exertional angina pectoris. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, crossover study design was used in which patients took each treatment for a 4-week period. The 3 combinations equally reduced the incidence of angina attacks and decreased ST-segment depression. Left ventricular hypokinesia during exercise was lessened and end-systolic volume during exercise decreased with all combinations. Because of a corresponding reduction of normokinetic segmental function, global ejection fraction during exercise remained unchanged. Heart size increased (p less than 0.05) and the PR interval lengthened (p less than 0.001) with P-V and P-D compared to P-N. The largest number of adverse clinical reactions occurred with P-V, whereas the fewest occurred with P-D. Almost all patients preferred combined therapy over propranolol and many favored 1 combination over the others. In summary, when therapy with combined beta- and calcium channel-blocking drugs is planned, P-D should be considered the combination of first choice because of its low incidence of adverse clinical effects. In the presence of possible or definite abnormalities of atrioventricular nodal conduction or decreased left ventricular function, P-N should be considered. Although P-V is associated with frequent adverse reactions, a trial may be warranted if the other combinations are unsuccessful.

摘要

对19例慢性劳力性心绞痛患者研究了普萘洛尔、普萘洛尔-维拉帕米(P-V)、普萘洛尔-硝苯地平(P-N)和普萘洛尔-地尔硫䓬(P-D)的临床和血流动力学效应。采用安慰剂对照、双盲、随机、交叉研究设计,患者每种治疗服用4周。这3种联合用药均同等程度降低了心绞痛发作的发生率,并减轻了ST段压低。所有联合用药均可减轻运动时左心室运动减弱,并降低运动时的收缩末期容积。由于正常运动节段功能相应降低,运动时的整体射血分数保持不变。与P-N相比,P-V和P-D使心脏大小增加(p<0.05),PR间期延长(p<0.001)。P-V出现的不良临床反应最多,而P-D最少。几乎所有患者更喜欢联合治疗而非普萘洛尔,且许多患者更青睐其中一种联合用药。总之,当计划使用β受体阻滞剂和钙通道阻滞剂联合治疗时,由于其不良临床效应发生率低,P-D应被视为首选联合用药。若存在可能或明确的房室结传导异常或左心室功能降低,应考虑使用P-N。尽管P-V常伴有不良反应,但如果其他联合用药无效,进行试验可能是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验