Pradhan Anwesh, J Muthukumaran
Department of Physiotherapy, Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, IND.
Cureus. 2024 May 6;16(5):e59722. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59722. eCollection 2024 May.
Introduction Sciatica refers to a pain that travels along the course of the sciatic nerve. Patients also often experience paresthesia along with the pain in thighs, which may further radiate to the legs. Most commonly, compression of the lumbosacral nerve root is the cause of this syndrome. Neurodynamics and conventional exercises are considered effective treatment procedures for sciatica. This study aims to find out the efficacy of neurodynamics along with conventional exercises and conventional exercises alone. Methods A total of 58 patients with sciatica aged between 30 and 60 years of both genders were included in the study and randomly divided into a neurodynamic group (n=29) and a conventional group (n=29). Pre-test data were collected before the interventions, and post-test data were collected on the 14th day. The 101 numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) was used to measure data of sciatic pain, the patient-specific functional scale (PSFS) was used to measure the health-related quality of life (HRQL), and a surface electromyography (EMG) biofeedback instrument was used to measure the peak and average muscle activation of the biceps femoris muscle. Results The pre-post data analysis of the neurodynamics and conventional group showed significant (p<0.05) improvement in 101 NPRS, PSFS, and peak EMG values. Insignificant (p>0.05) improvements were seen in average EMG values in the conventional group, and significant (p<0.05) improvement were seen in the neurodynamic group. Between-group analysis showed insignificant (p>0.05) differences in 101 NPRS as well as peak and average EMG values and showed significant (p<0.05) differences in PSFS values. Conclusion Neurodynamics with conventional exercises can help in reducing pain, improving muscle activation of the biceps femoris, and elevating the HRQL of the patient.
引言
坐骨神经痛是指沿坐骨神经走行的疼痛。患者通常还会在大腿疼痛的同时伴有感觉异常,疼痛可能会进一步放射至腿部。最常见的是,腰骶神经根受压是该综合征的病因。神经动力学和传统运动被认为是治疗坐骨神经痛的有效方法。本研究旨在探究神经动力学联合传统运动与单纯传统运动的疗效。
方法
本研究共纳入58例年龄在30至60岁之间的坐骨神经痛患者,男女不限,并随机分为神经动力学组(n = 29)和传统组(n = 29)。干预前收集预测试数据,在第14天收集后测试数据。采用101数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)测量坐骨神经痛数据,采用患者特异性功能量表(PSFS)测量健康相关生活质量(HRQL),并使用表面肌电图(EMG)生物反馈仪测量股二头肌的峰值和平均肌肉激活情况。
结果
神经动力学组和传统组的前后数据分析显示,101 NPRS、PSFS和EMG峰值均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。传统组平均EMG值改善不显著(p > 0.05),神经动力学组有显著改善(p < 0.05)。组间分析显示,101 NPRS以及EMG峰值和平均值无显著差异(p > 0.05),PSFS值有显著差异(p < 0.05)。
结论
神经动力学联合传统运动有助于减轻疼痛,改善股二头肌的肌肉激活,并提高患者的健康相关生活质量。