• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察动作驱动注意在集合处理中的作用。

Examining the role of action-driven attention in ensemble processing.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Scarborough, Canada.

出版信息

J Vis. 2024 Jun 3;24(6):5. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.6.5.

DOI:10.1167/jov.24.6.5
PMID:38842835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11160948/
Abstract

Ensemble processing allows the visual system to condense visual information into useful summary statistics (e.g., average size), thereby overcoming capacity limitations to visual working memory and attention. To examine the role of attention in ensemble processing, we conducted three experiments using a novel paradigm that merged the action effect (a manipulation of attention) and ensemble processing. Participants were instructed to make a simple action if the feature of a cue word corresponded to a subsequent shape. Immediately after, they were shown an ensemble display of eight ovals of varying sizes and were asked to report either the average size of all ovals or the size of a single oval from the set. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were cued with a task-relevant feature, and in Experiment 3, participants were cued with a task-irrelevant feature. Overall, the task-relevant cues that elicited an action influenced reports of average size in the ensemble phase more than the cues that were passively viewed, whereas task-irrelevant cues did not bias the reports of average size. The results of this study suggest that attention influences ensemble processing only when it is directed toward a task-relevant feature.

摘要

集合处理使视觉系统能够将视觉信息浓缩为有用的摘要统计信息(例如,平均值),从而克服了视觉工作记忆和注意力的容量限制。为了研究注意力在集合处理中的作用,我们使用了一种新颖的范式进行了三项实验,该范式将动作效应(注意力的一种操作)和集合处理融合在一起。参与者被指示如果提示词的特征与后续形状相对应,则执行一个简单的动作。之后,他们会看到一个由八个不同大小的椭圆形组成的集合显示,并被要求报告所有椭圆形的平均大小或集合中单个椭圆形的大小。在实验 1 和实验 2 中,参与者都用与任务相关的特征进行提示,而在实验 3 中,参与者用与任务无关的特征进行提示。总的来说,引发动作的与任务相关的提示比被动观察的提示对集合阶段的平均大小报告的影响更大,而与任务无关的提示则不会影响平均大小的报告。这项研究的结果表明,只有当注意力指向与任务相关的特征时,它才会影响集合处理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae2/11160948/ef96b905ad4e/jovi-24-6-5-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae2/11160948/3bc8b3859fc8/jovi-24-6-5-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae2/11160948/c133936995dd/jovi-24-6-5-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae2/11160948/a2b039656cea/jovi-24-6-5-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae2/11160948/4787f093197f/jovi-24-6-5-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae2/11160948/af1a63400af7/jovi-24-6-5-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae2/11160948/ef96b905ad4e/jovi-24-6-5-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae2/11160948/3bc8b3859fc8/jovi-24-6-5-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae2/11160948/c133936995dd/jovi-24-6-5-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae2/11160948/a2b039656cea/jovi-24-6-5-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae2/11160948/4787f093197f/jovi-24-6-5-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae2/11160948/af1a63400af7/jovi-24-6-5-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae2/11160948/ef96b905ad4e/jovi-24-6-5-f006.jpg

相似文献

1
Examining the role of action-driven attention in ensemble processing.考察动作驱动注意在集合处理中的作用。
J Vis. 2024 Jun 3;24(6):5. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.6.5.
2
Capacity limit of ensemble perception of multiple spatially intermixed sets.多个空间混合集合的整体感知能力极限。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Nov;80(8):2033-2047. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1572-1.
3
Size congruity influences visual search via the target template.大小一致性通过目标模板影响视觉搜索。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Feb;183:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
4
Distinct contributions of attention and working memory to visual statistical learning and ensemble processing.注意力和工作记忆对视觉统计学习与整体加工的独特贡献。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):1112-23. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000069. Epub 2015 May 25.
5
Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.基于维度的工作记忆驱动的视觉选择捕获
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jun;62(6):1123-31. doi: 10.1080/17470210802624353. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
6
Relative contributions of task-relevant and task-irrelevant dimensions in priming of pop-out.任务相关维度和任务无关维度在凸显启动中的相对贡献。
J Vis. 2014 Oct 13;14(12):14. doi: 10.1167/14.12.14.
7
Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.线索化视觉记忆对注意引导的快速影响。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1339:1-10. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12574. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
8
Perceptual biases during cued task switching relate to decision process differences between children and adults.线索提示任务切换过程中的知觉偏差与儿童和成人之间的决策过程差异有关。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Oct;44(10):1603-1618. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000552. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
9
Dual-state modulation of the contextual cueing effect: Evidence from eye movement recordings.情境线索效应的双态调制:来自眼动记录的证据。
J Vis. 2012 Jun 8;12(6):11. doi: 10.1167/12.6.11.
10
Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?任务转换中的线索切换代价:线索启动还是控制过程?
Psychol Res. 2010 Sep;74(5):481-90. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0270-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Value-driven effects on perceptual averaging.价值驱动对感知平均的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Apr;84(3):781-794. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02446-x. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
2
The anisotropic field of ensemble coding.整体编码的各向异性场。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 15;11(1):8212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87620-1.
3
Tuning the ensemble: Incidental skewing of the perceptual average through memory-driven selection.调整集成:通过记忆驱动的选择对感知平均值产生偶然的偏差。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 May;47(5):648-661. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000907. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
4
Global and local interference effects in ensemble encoding are best explained by interactions between summary representations of the mean and the range.总体和局部干扰效应对集合编码的影响,可以通过均值和范围的总结表示之间的相互作用得到最好的解释。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Apr;83(3):1106-1128. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02224-7. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
5
The timing mega-study: comparing a range of experiment generators, both lab-based and online.时机大研究:比较一系列实验生成器,包括基于实验室的和在线的。
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 20;8:e9414. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9414. eCollection 2020.
6
Effects of Selective Attention on Mean-Size Computation: Weighted Averaging and Perceptual Enlargement.选择性注意对平均大小计算的影响:加权平均与感知放大
Psychol Sci. 2020 Oct;31(10):1261-1271. doi: 10.1177/0956797620943834. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
7
Roles of saliency and set size in ensemble averaging.显著性和集合大小在整体平均中的作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Apr;83(3):1251-1262. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02089-w.
8
Ensemble perception without attention depends upon attentional control settings.无需注意的集成感知依赖于注意控制设置。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Apr;83(3):1240-1250. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02067-2.
9
Ensemble perception and focused attention: Two different modes of visual processing to cope with limited capacity.整体感知和集中注意:应对有限容量的两种不同视觉加工模式。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Aug;27(4):602-606. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01718-7.
10
Distributed attention model of perceptual averaging.知觉平均的分布式注意模型。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jan;82(1):63-79. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01827-z.