• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双层 CGuard 支架治疗急性亚闭塞性颈动脉狭窄和串联闭塞:一项单中心研究。

Stenting with dual-layer CGuard stent in acute sub-occlusive carotid artery stenosis and in tandem occlusions: a monocentric study.

机构信息

Department of Neuroradiology, Bonn University Hospital, Venusberg-Campus1, Gebäude 81, 53127, Bonn, Germany.

Department of Neurology, Bonn University Hospital, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 2024 Sep;66(9):1635-1644. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03397-w. Epub 2024 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00234-024-03397-w
PMID:38844697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11322317/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Double-layer design carotid stents have been cast in a negative light since several investigations reported high rates of in-stent occlusions, at least in the acute setting of tandem occlusions. CGuard is a new generation double-layered stent that was designed to prevent periinterventional embolic events. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of the CGuard in emergent CAS and for the acute treatment of tandem occlusions in comparison with the single-layer Carotid Wallstent (CWS) system.

METHODS

All patients who underwent CAS with CGuard or CWS after intracranial mechanical thrombectomy (MT) between 11/2018 and 12/2022 were identified from our local thrombectomy registry. Clinical, interventional and neuroimaging data were analyzed. Patency of the stent was assessed within 72 h. Intracranial hemorrhage and modified Rankin score (mRS) at discharge were the main endpoints.

RESULTS

In total, 86 stent procedures in 86 patients were included (CWS: 44, CGuard: 42). CGuard had a lower, but not statistically significant rate (p = 0.431) of in-stent occlusions (n = 2, 4.8%) when compared to the CWS (n = 4, 9.1%). Significant in-stent stenosis was found in one case in each group. There was no statistically significant difference in functional outcome at discharge between the two groups with a median mRS for CGuard of 2 (IQR:1-5) vs. CWS 3 (IQR:2-4).

CONCLUSION

In our series, the rate of in-stent occlusions after emergent CAS was lower with the dual-layer CGuard when compared to the monolayer CWS. Further data are needed to evaluate the potential benefit of the design in more detail.

摘要

目的

由于几项研究报告称在串联闭塞的急性情况下,支架内闭塞发生率很高,双层设计的颈动脉支架一直受到负面评价。CGuard 是一种新一代的双层支架,旨在预防介入治疗期间的栓塞事件。本研究旨在分析 CGuard 在紧急颈动脉内膜切除术(CAS)中的安全性和疗效,并与单层颈动脉 Wallstent(CWS)系统比较,用于急性治疗串联闭塞。

方法

从我们当地的血栓切除术登记处确定了 2018 年 11 月至 2022 年 12 月期间接受颅内机械血栓切除术(MT)后接受 CGuard 或 CWS 行 CAS 的所有患者。分析了临床、介入和神经影像学数据。在 72 小时内评估支架的通畅性。颅内出血和改良 Rankin 评分(mRS)为出院的主要终点。

结果

共纳入 86 例 86 例支架手术(CWS:44 例,CGuard:42 例)。与 CWS(n=4,9.1%)相比,CGuard 的支架内闭塞发生率较低,但无统计学意义(p=0.431)(n=2,4.8%)。两组均有 1 例支架内明显狭窄。两组出院时的功能结局无统计学差异,CGuard 的中位 mRS 为 2(IQR:1-5),CWS 为 3(IQR:2-4)。

结论

在我们的系列中,与单层 CWS 相比,紧急 CAS 后双层 CGuard 的支架内闭塞率较低。需要进一步的数据来更详细地评估设计的潜在益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3613/11322317/6bc4bc674fcf/234_2024_3397_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3613/11322317/5d7f44bc066f/234_2024_3397_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3613/11322317/6bc4bc674fcf/234_2024_3397_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3613/11322317/5d7f44bc066f/234_2024_3397_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3613/11322317/6bc4bc674fcf/234_2024_3397_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Stenting with dual-layer CGuard stent in acute sub-occlusive carotid artery stenosis and in tandem occlusions: a monocentric study.双层 CGuard 支架治疗急性亚闭塞性颈动脉狭窄和串联闭塞:一项单中心研究。
Neuroradiology. 2024 Sep;66(9):1635-1644. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03397-w. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
2
The Dual-layer CGuard Stent Is Safe and Effective in Emergent Carotid Artery Stenting and in Tandem Occlusions: a Multi-centric Study.双层CGuard支架在急诊颈动脉支架置入术和串联闭塞病变中安全有效:一项多中心研究。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2025 Mar;35(1):77-85. doi: 10.1007/s00062-024-01455-7. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
3
Comparative analysis of CGUARD embolic prevention stent with Casper-RX and Wallstent for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis.CGUARD栓塞预防支架与Casper-RX和Wallstent治疗颈动脉狭窄的对比分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 May;75:117-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Carotid Artery Stenting with the CGuard Double-layer Stent in Acute Ischemic Stroke.颈动脉支架置入术联合 CGuard 双层支架治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的安全性和有效性。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2023 Mar;33(1):237-244. doi: 10.1007/s00062-022-01209-3. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
5
Short-Term Double Layer Mesh Stent Patency for Emergent or Elective Carotid Artery Stenting.用于紧急或选择性颈动脉支架置入术的短期双层网眼支架通畅率。
Stroke. 2019 Jul;50(7):1898-1901. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024586. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
6
Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of the carotid Casper-RX stent for tandem lesions in acute ischemic stroke.评价颈动脉 Casper-RX 支架治疗急性缺血性脑卒中串联病变的有效性和安全性。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Aug;11(8):772-774. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014425. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
7
Carotid Artery Stenting in Acute Stroke Using a Microporous Stent Device: A Single-Center Experience.使用微孔支架装置进行急性卒中的颈动脉支架置入术:单中心经验
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:e1003-e1012. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.024. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
8
Acute Occlusions of Dual-Layer Carotid Stents After Endovascular Emergency Treatment of Tandem Lesions.急性双层颈动脉支架闭塞后血管内紧急治疗串联病变。
Stroke. 2017 Aug;48(8):2171-2175. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015965. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
9
Safety and Efficacy of the New Micromesh-Covered Stent CGuard in Patients Undergoing Carotid Artery Stenting: Early Experience From a Single Centre.新型微网覆盖支架 CGuard 在颈动脉支架置入术中的安全性和疗效:单中心的早期经验。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Dec;54(6):681-687. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
10
Thirty-Day Results of the Novel CGuard-Covered Stent in Patients Undergoing Carotid Artery Stenting.新型 CGuard 覆膜支架治疗颈动脉支架置入术患者的 30 天结果。
J Endovasc Ther. 2021 Aug;28(4):542-548. doi: 10.1177/15266028211007466. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-centric AI Model for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Detection and Volumetric Segmentation in 3D TOF-MRI.用于在3D TOF-MRI中检测未破裂颅内动脉瘤和进行体积分割的多中心人工智能模型
J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s10278-025-01533-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of extracranial carotid artery stenosis during endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: results from the MR CLEAN Registry.急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗期间颅外颈动脉狭窄的管理:MR CLEAN 登记研究结果。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2023 Jun;8(3):229-237. doi: 10.1136/svn-2022-001891. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
2
Emergent carotid endarterectomy and mechanical thrombectomy in tandem occlusion.串联闭塞时的急诊颈动脉内膜切除术和机械取栓术
Surg Neurol Int. 2022 Nov 11;13:521. doi: 10.25259/SNI_740_2022. eCollection 2022.
3
Safety and Efficacy of Carotid Artery Stenting with the CGuard Double-layer Stent in Acute Ischemic Stroke.
颈动脉支架置入术联合 CGuard 双层支架治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的安全性和有效性。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2023 Mar;33(1):237-244. doi: 10.1007/s00062-022-01209-3. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
4
Comparison of Restenosis Risk in Single-Layer versus Dual-Layer Carotid Stents: A Duplex Ultrasound Evaluation.单层与双层颈动脉支架再狭窄风险比较:双功能超声评估。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Sep;45(9):1257-1266. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03200-4. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
5
1-Year Results From a Prospective Experience on CAS Using the CGuard Stent System: The IRONGUARD 2 Study.使用 CGuard 支架系统的 CAS 前瞻性经验的 1 年结果:IRONGUARD 2 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 13;14(17):1917-1923. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.05.045. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
6
Endovascular Therapy of Anterior Circulation Tandem Occlusions: Pooled Analysis From the TITAN and ETIS Registries.前循环串联闭塞血管内治疗:TITAN 和 ETIS 注册研究的汇总分析。
Stroke. 2021 Oct;52(10):3097-3105. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.033032. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
7
Tandem Lesions in Anterior Circulation Stroke: Analysis of the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment.串联病变在前循环卒中中的作用:德国卒中登记库血管内治疗分析。
Stroke. 2021 Apr;52(4):1265-1275. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031797. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
8
Safety and efficacy of symptomatic carotid artery stenting performed in an emergency setting.在紧急情况下进行症状性颈动脉支架置入术的安全性和疗效。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2021 Jun;27(3):411-418. doi: 10.1177/1591019920977552. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
9
Considerations for Antiplatelet Management of Carotid Stenting in the Setting of Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Delphi Consensus Statement.考虑在机械取栓的情况下对颈动脉支架置入术进行抗血小板管理:德尔菲共识声明。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Dec;41(12):2274-2279. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6888. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
10
Comparison of open- and closed-cell stent design outcomes after carotid artery stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative.在血管质量倡议中,比较颈动脉支架置入术后开腔和闭腔支架设计结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1639-1648. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.155. Epub 2020 Oct 17.