Angiotensin II-induced hypothermia in rats.

Systemic administration of angiotensin II (ANG II) (200 micrograms/kg sc) to the rat induced a hypothermic response that was characterized within 12 min by a reduction in the rate of O2 consumption, vasodilation of the tail, and a 1.3 degrees C fall in colonic temperature. Administration of ANG II in doses ranging from 10 to 200 micrograms/kg resulted in a decrease in colonic and an increase in tail skin temperature. Angiotensin I (ANG I) (200 micrograms/kg sc) induced a similar hypothermic response which was abolished by pretreatment with the ANG I-converting enzyme inhibitor, captopril (35 mg/kg ip). The interaction of ANG II with cholinergic and adrenergic pathways was evaluated to determine possible mechanisms. Treatment with ANG II (200 micrograms/kg sc) and propranolol, a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist (6 mg/kg ip), resulted in a greater depression of colonic temperature (Tco) than was observed with ANG II alone but did not affect the increase in tail skin temperature (Tsk) accompanying administration of ANG II. When ANG II was administered in combination with the beta-adrenergic agonist, isoproterenol (50 micrograms/kg ip), Tco remained at control levels, whereas an enhancement of the ANG II-induced increase in Tsk occurred. Administration of ANG II in combination with atropine sulfate (6 mg/kg ip), a muscarinic receptor antagonist which crosses the blood-brain barrier, significantly reduced the extent of the fall in Tco without affecting the increase in Tsk. The combined treatment of ANG II and the quaternary analogue, atropine methyl nitrate (3.25 mg/kg ip), which does not cross the blood-brain barrier, failed to affect the hypothermic responses to ANG II. These results suggest that the hypothermic responses to ANG II may be mediated through a central cholinergic pathway and possibly influenced by an adrenergic component. The inability of both adrenergic and cholinergic blockers to affect the vasodilatory response of the tail of the rat to administration of ANG II suggests that the mechanisms subserving heat production can be blocked independently of those subserving heat loss.