Feng Hua, Shang Shuxian, Chen Kun, Sun Xuan, Yue Xueping
Department of Dermatology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hospital of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing, China.
Front Oncol. 2024 May 23;14:1399693. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1399693. eCollection 2024.
There is evidence of a modest reduction in skin cancer risk among metformin users. However, no studies have further examined the effects of metformin on melanoma survival and safety outcomes. This study aimed to quantitatively summarize any influence of metformin on the overall survival (OS) and immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) in melanoma patients.
Selection criteria: The inclusion criteria were designed based on the PICOS principles. Information sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for relevant literature published from the inception of these databases until November 2023 using and as keywords. Survival outcomes were OS, progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and mortality; the safety outcome was irAEs. Risk of bias and data Synthesis: The Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trial 2 (RoB2) and methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) were selected to assess the risk of bias. The Cochrane Q and statistics based on Stata 15.1 SE were used to test the heterogeneity among all studies. Funnel plot, Egger regression, and Begg tests were used to evaluate publication bias. The leave-one-out method was selected as the sensitivity analysis tool.
A total of 12 studies were included, involving 111,036 melanoma patients. The pooled HR for OS was 0.64 (95% CI [0.42, 1.00], p = 0.004, I 73.7%), HR for PFS was 0.89 (95% CI [0.70, 1.12], p = 0.163, I 41.4%), HR for RFS was 0.62 (95% CI [0.26, 1.48], p = 0.085, I 66.3%), and HR for mortality was 0.53 (95% CI [0.46, 0.63], p = 0.775, I 0.0%). There was no significant difference in irAEs incidence (OR = 1.01; 95% CI [0.42, 2.41]; p = 0.642) between metformin and no metformin groups.
The improvement in overall survival of melanoma patients with metformin may indirectly result from its diverse biological targets and beneficial effects on multiple systemic diseases. While we could not demonstrate a specific improvement in the survival of melanoma patients, the combined benefits and safety of metformin for patients taking the drug are worthy of recognition.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024518182.
有证据表明二甲双胍使用者患皮肤癌的风险略有降低。然而,尚无研究进一步探讨二甲双胍对黑色素瘤生存及安全性结局的影响。本研究旨在定量总结二甲双胍对黑色素瘤患者总生存期(OS)和免疫相关不良反应(irAE)的任何影响。
选择标准:纳入标准基于PICOS原则制定。信息来源:使用 和 作为关键词,在PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science中检索从这些数据库建立至2023年11月发表的相关文献。生存结局包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、无复发生存期(RFS)和死亡率;安全性结局为irAE。偏倚风险和数据综合分析:选择Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险评估工具2(RoB2)和非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)来评估偏倚风险。基于Stata 15.1 SE的Cochrane Q和 统计量用于检验所有研究之间的异质性。漏斗图、Egger回归和Begg检验用于评估发表偏倚。选择留一法作为敏感性分析工具。
共纳入12项研究,涉及111,036例黑色素瘤患者。OS的合并风险比(HR)为0.64(95%置信区间[0.42, 1.00],p = 0.004,I² = 73.7%),PFS的HR为0.89(95%置信区间[0.70, 1.12],p = 0.163,I² = 41.4%),RFS的HR为0.62(95%置信区间[0.26, 1.48],p = 0.085,I² = 66.3%),死亡率的HR为0.53(95%置信区间[0.46, 0.63],p = 0.775,I² = 0.0%)。二甲双胍组和非二甲双胍组的irAE发生率无显著差异(OR = 1.01;95%置信区间[0.42, 2.41];p = 0.642)。
二甲双胍使黑色素瘤患者总生存期得到改善可能间接源于其多样的生物学靶点以及对多种全身性疾病的有益作用。虽然我们未能证明二甲双胍对黑色素瘤患者生存有特定改善,但二甲双胍对用药患者的综合益处及安全性值得认可。