丹麦公民对屏幕检测出心血管疾病后的预防药物的看法:一项定性研究。
Danish citizens' perspectives on the preventive medication recommended after screen-detected cardiovascular disease: A qualitative study.
机构信息
Vascular Research Unit, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
出版信息
Scand J Caring Sci. 2024 Sep;38(3):802-814. doi: 10.1111/scs.13274. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
BACKGROUND
The rationale for screening for cardiovascular disease (CVD) is debated as a prevention strategy. However, research shows that when preventive medication is initiated after screening for CVD, mortality rates decrease, especially among men. When implementing screening programmes, facilitating citizens' informed decisions and empowering their autonomy in the decision-making process are crucial. We therefore aimed to explore citizens' perspectives on and decisions regarding initiating cardiovascular preventive medication for screen-detected CVD.
METHODS
We employed an exploratory qualitative design using semi-structured interviews to investigate participants' perspectives on and decisions regarding initiating cardiovascular preventive medication for screen-detected CVD. Twelve interviews were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's six-step approach.
FINDINGS
We found one overall theme, Being on a continuum between wellness and illness, with two underlying sub-themes. Sub-theme (1) Navigating mixed feelings and pathways reflects participants' perspectives on CVD preventive medication, which were positioned on a continuum with shifting perspectives. The state between wellness and illness was experienced as liminal and characterised by uncertainty and concerns about CVD risk. (2) Navigating medication decisions: a negotiated process. Pivotal medical decisions hinged on trust in authorities or own judgement, influenced by attitudes towards the need for medication, perception of meaningfulness, asymptomatic condition, age, family responsibility and predisposition. Participants' medical decisions were supported and impacted by significant others.
CONCLUSION
We uncovered a continuum of shifting perspectives ranging from feeling improved health to experiencing fear of CVD. For certain citizens, it is like navigating between these contrasting feelings. The perceived necessity and meaningfulness, in particular, shape medical decisions. Providing support for informed decisions is crucial and includes significant others. Shared decision-making with healthcare professionals as facilitators is needed. Future research is warranted to investigate how to embrace the various perspectives on initiating CVD preventive medication in clinical practice.
背景
作为一种预防策略,对心血管疾病 (CVD) 进行筛查的理由存在争议。然而,研究表明,当对 CVD 进行筛查后开始预防性药物治疗时,死亡率会降低,尤其是男性。在实施筛查计划时,促进公民知情决策并增强他们在决策过程中的自主权至关重要。因此,我们旨在探讨公民对筛查发现的 CVD 启动心血管预防药物的看法和决策。
方法
我们采用探索性定性设计,使用半结构化访谈来调查参与者对筛查发现的 CVD 启动心血管预防药物的看法和决策。进行了 12 次访谈,并使用 Braun 和 Clarke 的六步方法进行主题分析来分析数据。
结果
我们发现了一个总体主题,即处于健康和疾病之间的连续体,有两个潜在的主题。子主题 (1) 探索混合情绪和途径反映了参与者对 CVD 预防药物的看法,这些看法位于连续体上,观点不断变化。健康和疾病之间的状态被体验为边缘状态,其特征是不确定和对 CVD 风险的担忧。(2) 探索药物决策:协商过程。关键的医疗决策取决于对权威或自己判断的信任,受对药物需求的态度、对意义的感知、无症状状态、年龄、家庭责任和倾向的影响。参与者的医疗决策得到了重要他人的支持和影响。
结论
我们发现了一种从感觉健康改善到对 CVD 感到恐惧的不断变化的观点连续体。对某些公民来说,就像在这些对比鲜明的感觉之间游走一样。感知到的必要性和意义,特别是,影响药物决策。为知情决策提供支持至关重要,包括重要他人。需要与医疗保健专业人员一起进行共同决策。需要进一步研究如何在临床实践中接受启动 CVD 预防药物的各种观点。