Lin Chun-Ru, Tsai Sung Huang Laurent, Yu Ta-Wei, Lin Po-Cheng, Tsai Zheng-Da, Lee Kuo-Hao, Fu Tsai-Sheng, Lai Po-Liang, Tsai Tsung-Ting, Hu Yung-Hsueh
Department of Medical Education, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, No. 5, Fuxing Street, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, 333, Taiwan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung Branch, and Chang Gung University, F7, No 222 Mai-King Road, Keelung, Taiwan.
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jan;34(1):380-403. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08164-2. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
Thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (TOLF), a rare condition more prevalent in East Asia, is managed through open and endoscopic surgical approaches. Determining the superior surgical option remains unclear. This study assesses the safety and clinical outcomes associated with these approaches in TOLF patients.
Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic literature search up to August 5, 2023, across PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies reporting complication rates, mJOA (modified Japanese Orthopedic Association) scores, JOA scores, VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scores, or hospitalization duration for both open and endoscopic surgeries in TOLF patients.
We analyzed 37 studies encompassing 1,646 TOLF patients using a random-effects model. Our findings revealed a significant difference in complication rates (overall complication rates: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.19; p < 0.01; I2: 69%; quality of evidence: moderate), with lower complication rates in the endoscopy group. However, no significant differences were observed in JOA scores (overall JOA: 8.35; 95% CI: 7.16, 9.54; p = 0.12; I2: 99%; quality of evidence: very low), VAS scores (overall VAS: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.59; p = 0.35; I2: 91%; quality of evidence: very low), or hospitalization duration (hospital stay: 10.83 days; 95% CI: 6.86, 14.80; p = 0.35; I2: 91%; quality of evidence: very low) between the open and endoscopic groups.
This meta-analysis reports lower complication rates and improved postoperative mJOA scores for endoscopic surgery in TOLF patients compared to open surgery. It represents the first comprehensive evaluation of clinical outcomes and safety of different surgical approaches for TOLF patients. Further randomized controlled trials are essential to validate these findings.
胸椎黄韧带骨化(TOLF)是一种在东亚地区更为常见的罕见病症,可通过开放手术和内镜手术进行治疗。目前尚不清楚哪种手术方式更为优越。本研究评估了这些手术方式在TOLF患者中的安全性和临床疗效。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,我们在截至2023年8月5日的时间范围内,对PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane和ClinicalTrials.gov进行了系统的文献检索。我们纳入了随机对照试验和队列研究,这些研究报告了TOLF患者开放手术和内镜手术的并发症发生率、改良日本骨科学会(mJOA)评分、日本骨科学会(JOA)评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分或住院时间。
我们使用随机效应模型分析了37项研究,共纳入1646例TOLF患者。我们的研究结果显示,两组并发症发生率存在显著差异(总体并发症发生率:0.12;95%置信区间:0.07,0.19;p<0.01;I²:69%;证据质量:中等),内镜手术组的并发症发生率较低。然而,开放手术组和内镜手术组在JOA评分(总体JOA评分:8.35;95%置信区间:7.16,9.54;p = 0.12;I²:99%;证据质量:极低)、VAS评分(总体VAS评分:1.31;95%置信区间:1.03,1.59;p = 0.35;I²:91%;证据质量:极低)或住院时间(住院天数:10.83天;95%置信区间:6.86,14.80;p = 0.35;I²:91%;证据质量:极低)方面均未观察到显著差异。
本Meta分析报告称,与开放手术相比,TOLF患者接受内镜手术的并发症发生率更低,术后mJOA评分更高。这是对TOLF患者不同手术方式的临床疗效和安全性的首次综合评估。进一步的随机对照试验对于验证这些结果至关重要。