Zipse Lauryn, Gallée Jeanne, Shattuck-Hufnagel Stefanie
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2025 May;35(4):863-903. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2024.2362243. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
It is unclear whether individuals with agrammatic aphasia have particularly disrupted prosody, or in fact have relatively preserved prosody they can use in a compensatory way. A targeted literature review was undertaken to examine the evidence regarding the capacity of speakers with agrammatic aphasia to produce prosody. The aim was to answer the question, how much prosody can a speaker "do" with limited syntax? The literature was systematically searched for articles examining the production of grammatical prosody in people with agrammatism, and yielded 16 studies that were ultimately included in this review. Participant inclusion criteria, spoken language tasks, and analysis procedures vary widely across studies. The evidence indicates that timing aspects of prosody are disrupted in people with agrammatic aphasia, while the use of pitch and amplitude cues is more likely to be preserved in this population. Some, but not all, of these timing differences may be attributable to motor speech programming deficits (AOS) rather than aphasia, as these conditions frequently co-occur. Many of the included studies do not address AOS and its possible role in any observed effects. Finally, the available evidence indicates that even speakers with severe aphasia show a degree of preserved prosody in functional communication.
语法缺失性失语症患者的韵律是否特别紊乱,或者实际上他们是否保留了可以用于补偿的相对完好的韵律,目前尚不清楚。我们进行了一项有针对性的文献综述,以研究有关语法缺失性失语症患者产生韵律能力的证据。目的是回答这个问题:说话者在句法有限的情况下能运用多少韵律?我们系统地检索了文献,查找研究语法缺失症患者语法韵律产生情况的文章,最终筛选出16项研究纳入本综述。各研究的参与者纳入标准、口语任务和分析程序差异很大。证据表明,语法缺失性失语症患者韵律的时间方面受到干扰,而音高和振幅线索的运用在该人群中更有可能得以保留。这些时间差异中的一些(但不是全部)可能归因于言语运动编程缺陷(AOS)而非失语症,因为这些情况经常同时出现。许多纳入研究并未涉及AOS及其在任何观察到的效应中可能发挥的作用。最后,现有证据表明,即使是重度失语症患者在功能性交流中也表现出一定程度的韵律保留。