Suppr超能文献

换用西替利嗪作为紫杉醇预处理方案中组胺 H1 受体拮抗剂氯马斯汀的效果:H1 转换研究。

Effect of Switching the Histamine-1 Receptor Antagonist Clemastine to Cetirizine in Paclitaxel Premedication Regimens: The H1-Switch Study.

机构信息

Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Sep;20(9):1243-1251. doi: 10.1200/OP.24.00110. Epub 2024 Jun 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Premedication, including a histamine-1 receptor (H) antagonist, is recommended to all patients treated with paclitaxel chemotherapy to reduce the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). However, the scientific basis for this premedication is not robust, which provides opportunities for optimization. Substitution of intravenously administered first-generation H antagonist for orally administered second-generation H antagonist could reduce side effects, and improve efficiency and sustainability. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of substituting intravenous clemastine for oral cetirizine as prophylaxis for paclitaxel-induced HSRs.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective, noninferiority study compares a historic cohort receiving a premedication regimen with intravenous clemastine to a prospective cohort receiving oral cetirizine. Primary end point of the study is HSR grade ≥3. The difference in incidence was calculated together with the 90% CI. We determined that the two-sided 90% CI of HSR grade ≥3 incidence in the oral cetirizine cohort should not be more than 4% higher (ie, the noninferiority margin) compared with the intravenous clemastine cohort.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twelve patients were included in the oral cetirizine cohort (June 2022 and May 2023) and 183 in the intravenous clemastine cohort. HSR grade ≥3 incidence was 1.6% (n = 3) in the intravenous clemastine cohort and 0.5% (n = 1) in the oral cetirizine cohort, resulting in a difference of -1.2% (90% CI, -3.4 to 1.1).

CONCLUSION

Premedication containing oral cetirizine is as safe as premedication containing intravenous clemastine in preventing paclitaxel-induced HSR grade ≥3. These findings could contribute to optimization of care for patients and improve efficiency and sustainability.

摘要

目的

建议所有接受紫杉醇化疗的患者进行预用药治疗,包括组胺 1 受体(H)拮抗剂,以降低过敏反应(HSR)的发生率。然而,这种预用药的科学依据并不充分,这为优化提供了机会。用静脉注射第一代 H 拮抗剂替代口服第二代 H 拮抗剂可以减少副作用,并提高效率和可持续性。本研究调查了替代静脉注射氯苯那敏作为紫杉醇诱导 HSR 预防的口服西替利嗪的疗效和安全性。

方法

这项单中心、前瞻性、非劣效性研究比较了接受静脉注射氯苯那敏预用药方案的历史队列和接受口服西替利嗪的前瞻性队列。研究的主要终点是 HSR 等级≥3。发生率的差异与 90%CI 一起计算。我们确定,口服西替利嗪队列中 HSR 等级≥3 的发生率的双侧 90%CI 不应比静脉注射氯苯那敏队列高 4%(即非劣效性边界)。

结果

183 例患者被纳入静脉注射氯苯那敏队列(2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 5 月),212 例患者被纳入口服西替利嗪队列。静脉注射氯苯那敏队列中 HSR 等级≥3 的发生率为 1.6%(n=3),口服西替利嗪队列中为 0.5%(n=1),差异为-1.2%(90%CI,-3.4 至 1.1)。

结论

在预防紫杉醇诱导的 HSR 等级≥3 方面,含口服西替利嗪的预用药与含静脉注射氯苯那敏的预用药一样安全。这些发现可能有助于优化患者的护理,并提高效率和可持续性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验