Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, London, UK.
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Public Health. 2024 Aug;233:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.05.001. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
Variation exists in the capabilities of electronic healthcare records (EHRs) systems and the frequency of their use by primary care physicians (PCPs) from different settings. We aimed to examine the factors associated with everyday EHRs use by PCPs, characterise the EHRs features available to PCPs, and to identify the impact of practice settings on feature availability.
Cross-sectional study.
PCPs from 20 countries completed cross-sectional online survey between June and September 2020. Responses which reported frequency of EHRs use were retained. Associations between everyday EHRs use and PCP and practice factors (country, urbanicity, and digital maturity) were explored using multivariable logistic regression analyses. The effect of practice factors on the variation in availability of ten EHRs features was estimated using Cramer's V.
Responses from 1520 out of 1605 PCPs surveyed (94·7%) were retained. Everyday EHRs use was reported by 91·2% of PCPs. Everyday EHRs use was associated with PCPs working >28 h per week, having more years of experience using EHRs, country of employment, and higher digital maturity. EHRs features concerning entering, and retrieving data were available to most PCPs. Few PCPs reported having access to tools for 'interactive patient education' (37·3%) or 'home monitoring and self-testing of chronic conditions' (34·3%). Country of practice was associated with availability of all EHRs features (Cramer's V range: 0·2-0·6), particularly with availability of tools enabling patient EHRs access (Cramer's V: 0·6, P < 0.0001). Greater feature availability of EHRs features was observed with greater digital maturity.
EHRs features intended for patient use were uncommon across countries and levels of digital maturity. Systems-level research is necessary to identify the country-specific barriers impeding the implementation of EHRs features in primary care, particularly of EHRs features enabling patient interaction with EHRs, to develop strategies to improve systems-wide EHRs use.
电子医疗记录 (EHR) 系统的功能以及初级保健医生 (PCP) 使用 EHR 的频率在不同环境中存在差异。本研究旨在调查与 PCP 日常使用 EHR 相关的因素,描述 PCP 可获得的 EHR 功能,并确定实践环境对功能可用性的影响。
横断面研究。
来自 20 个国家的 PCP 于 2020 年 6 月至 9 月间完成了横断面在线调查。保留报告 EHR 使用频率的应答。使用多变量逻辑回归分析调查 PCP 和实践因素(国家、城市和数字成熟度)与日常 EHR 使用之间的关联。使用 Cramer's V 估计实践因素对十种 EHR 功能可用性变化的影响。
共保留了调查的 1605 名 PCP 中 1520 名(94.7%)的应答。91.2%的 PCP 报告日常使用 EHR。日常 EHR 使用与每周工作>28 小时、使用 EHR 经验更多年、就业国家以及更高的数字成熟度相关。输入和检索数据的 EHR 功能大多数 PCP 均可使用。很少有 PCP 报告能够使用“互动式患者教育”(37.3%)或“慢性病家庭监测和自我测试”(34.3%)工具。实践国家与所有 EHR 功能的可用性相关(Cramer's V 范围:0.2-0.6),特别是与允许患者访问 EHR 的工具的可用性相关(Cramer's V:0.6,P<0.0001)。随着数字成熟度的提高,EHR 功能的可用性更高。
各国和数字成熟度不同,用于患者使用的 EHR 功能并不常见。需要进行系统层面的研究,以确定阻碍初级保健中 EHR 功能实施的具体国家障碍,特别是阻碍患者与 EHR 交互的 EHR 功能,制定改善全系统 EHR 使用的策略。