Wacker Eva, Fischer Axel, Schorlemmer Julia
FOM Hochschule Für Oekonomie Und Management Berlin, Institut Für Gesundheit Und Soziales, Bismarckstr. 107, 10625, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2024 Jun 7;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12995-024-00403-y.
In previous studies a moderator effect of management position could be found between Person-environment fit of masculinity, and burnout. Present study goals are to analyze previous fundings of the importance of the individual gender-role in relation to the work environment in more detail.
In this cross sectional explanative study, an online survey took place using Gender Role Orientation Scale (GTS +) by Altstötter-Gleich and DearEmployee-Survey by Wiedemann et al. The sample consists of 891 participants-516 female (58%), 373 male (42%), among those 277 executives (32%) and 594 participants without managerial responsibility (68%), age 17-70 years (M = 29.86; S = 7.67). Four groups were divided according to P-E fit in femininity and P-E fit in masculinity, this enabled a more precise distinction between the participants. The proportions of executives were determined, and compared in each group by a -Test Hierarchical linear regression models predicting burnout and proving moderator effects of managerial position were calculated for each group.
The proportions of executives were the highest in the two groups with participants, who had a higher individual masculinity compared to their work environment. A moderator effect of managerial position between P-E fit in masculinity and burnout was found in group "Indifferent" (participants with lower feminity and masculinity compared with work environment). With a worse P-E fit in masculinity burnout values rise for individuals with no managerial position. On the other hand, among leaders burnout values decrease a worse P-E fit in masculinity.
People with a high individual masculinity compared to work environment tend more to be selected as managers, regardless of the individual characteristics of femininity, which may generally lead to a highly masculine and less feminine leadership and corporate culture. This culture could increase burnout risk for people with low individual masculinity and high feminity scores compared to work environment as well as for persons with low individual masculinity and feminity compared to work environment, especially if they are not in a managerial position.
在之前的研究中,发现管理职位在男性气质的人-环境匹配与倦怠之间存在调节作用。本研究的目标是更详细地分析先前关于个体性别角色在工作环境方面重要性的研究结果。
在这项横断面解释性研究中,使用了由阿尔斯特特-格莱希编制的性别角色取向量表(GTS +)和维德曼等人编制的DearEmployee-调查问卷进行在线调查。样本包括891名参与者——516名女性(58%),373名男性(42%),其中277名高管(32%)和594名无管理职责的参与者(68%),年龄在17至70岁之间(M = 29.86;S = 7.67)。根据女性气质的人-环境匹配和男性气质的人-环境匹配将参与者分为四组,这使得能够对参与者进行更精确的区分。确定每组中高管的比例,并通过t检验进行组间比较。为每组计算预测倦怠并证明管理职位调节作用的分层线性回归模型。
在两组参与者中,高管比例最高,这些参与者的个体男性气质高于其工作环境。在“无差异”组(与工作环境相比女性气质和男性气质较低的参与者)中,发现管理职位在男性气质的人-环境匹配与倦怠之间存在调节作用。对于无管理职位的个体,男性气质的人-环境匹配越差,倦怠值越高。另一方面,在领导者中,男性气质的人-环境匹配越差,倦怠值越低。
与工作环境相比,个体男性气质较高的人更倾向于被选为管理者,无论其女性气质的个体特征如何,这可能总体上导致高度男性化且女性化程度较低的领导风格和企业文化。这种文化可能会增加与工作环境相比个体男性气质低且女性气质高的人以及个体男性气质和女性气质均低的人的倦怠风险,尤其是当他们不在管理职位时。