• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者在分子肿瘤委员会会议上进行影像学反应评估时参加试验的资格。

Patient eligibility for trials with imaging response assessment at the time of molecular tumor board presentation.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Cancer Imaging. 2024 Jun 7;24(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00708-5.

DOI:10.1186/s40644-024-00708-5
PMID:38849902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11157753/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the eligibility of patients with advanced or recurrent solid malignancies presented to a molecular tumor board (MTB) at a large precision oncology center for inclusion in trials with the endpoints objective response rate (ORR) or duration of response (DOR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1).

METHODS

Prospective patients with available imaging at the time of presentation in the MTB were included. Imaging data was reviewed for objectifiable measurable disease (MD) according to RECIST v1.1. Additionally, we evaluated the patients with MD for representativeness of the identified measurable lesion(s) in relation to the overall tumor burden.

RESULTS

262 patients with different solid malignancies were included. 177 patients (68%) had MD and 85 (32%) had non-measurable disease (NMD) at the time point of MTB presentation in accordance with RECIST v1.1. MD was not representative of the overall tumor burden in eleven patients (6%). The main reasons for NMD were lesions with longest diameter shorter than 10 mm (22%) and non-measurable peritoneal carcinomatosis (18%). Colorectal cancer and malignant melanoma displayed the highest rates of MD (> 75%). In contrast, gastric cancer, head and neck malignancies, and ovarian carcinoma had the lowest rates of MD (< 55%). In case of MD, the measurable lesions were representative of the overall tumor burden in the vast majority of cases (94%).

CONCLUSION

Approximately one third of cancer patients with advanced solid malignancies are not eligible for treatment response assessment in trials with endpoints ORR or DOR at the time of MTB presentation. The rate of patients eligible for trials with imaging endpoints differs significantly based on the underlying malignancy and should be taken under consideration during the planning of new precision oncology trials.

摘要

目的

评估在大型精准肿瘤中心的分子肿瘤委员会(MTB)就诊的晚期或复发性实体恶性肿瘤患者是否有资格参加以客观缓解率(ORR)或缓解持续时间(DOR)为终点的试验,这些患者的入组标准是基于实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST 版本 1.1)有可测量的疾病(MD)。

方法

前瞻性纳入 MTB 就诊时有可用影像学资料的患者。根据 RECIST v1.1 评估影像学数据是否存在可测量的 MD。此外,我们还评估了 MD 患者中,确定的可测量病变与总体肿瘤负担的代表性。

结果

共纳入 262 例不同实体恶性肿瘤患者。177 例(68%)患者根据 RECIST v1.1 在 MTB 就诊时存在 MD,85 例(32%)存在不可测量的疾病(NMD)。11 例(6%)患者的 MD 不能代表总体肿瘤负担。NMD 的主要原因是最长直径小于 10mm 的病变(22%)和不可测量的腹膜癌病(18%)。结直肠癌和恶性黑色素瘤的 MD 发生率最高(>75%)。相比之下,胃癌、头颈部恶性肿瘤和卵巢癌的 MD 发生率最低(<55%)。在 MD 的情况下,可测量的病变在绝大多数情况下能代表总体肿瘤负担(94%)。

结论

大约三分之一的晚期实体恶性肿瘤患者在 MTB 就诊时不符合以 ORR 或 DOR 为终点的试验治疗反应评估的条件。符合影像学终点试验的患者比例因基础恶性肿瘤而异,在规划新的精准肿瘤学试验时应加以考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/897f/11157753/ef86f44f7c68/40644_2024_708_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/897f/11157753/f9b9339e4bc1/40644_2024_708_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/897f/11157753/0a368d6bee0b/40644_2024_708_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/897f/11157753/0e5ade8a0527/40644_2024_708_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/897f/11157753/ef86f44f7c68/40644_2024_708_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/897f/11157753/f9b9339e4bc1/40644_2024_708_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/897f/11157753/0a368d6bee0b/40644_2024_708_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/897f/11157753/0e5ade8a0527/40644_2024_708_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/897f/11157753/ef86f44f7c68/40644_2024_708_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient eligibility for trials with imaging response assessment at the time of molecular tumor board presentation.患者在分子肿瘤委员会会议上进行影像学反应评估时参加试验的资格。
Cancer Imaging. 2024 Jun 7;24(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00708-5.
2
Comparison of Solid Tumor Treatment Response Observed in Clinical Practice With Response Reported in Clinical Trials.比较临床实践中观察到的实体瘤治疗反应与临床试验中报告的反应。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036741. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36741.
3
Tumor response assessment: comparison between unstructured free text reporting in routine clinical workflow and computer-aided evaluation based on RECIST 1.1 criteria.肿瘤反应评估:常规临床工作流程中的非结构化自由文本报告与基于RECIST 1.1标准的计算机辅助评估之间的比较
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;143(12):2527-2533. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2488-1. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
4
Impact of FDG PET Imaging for Expanding Patient Eligibility and Measuring Treatment Response in a Genome-Driven Basket Trial of the Pan-HER Kinase Inhibitor, Neratinib.基于全基因组篮式试验中泛 HER 激酶抑制剂奈拉替尼的 FDG PET 成像对扩大患者入选标准和评估治疗反应的影响。
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 15;25(24):7381-7387. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1658. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
5
Discrepancies of assessments in a RECIST 1.1 phase II clinical trial - association between adjudication rate and variability in images and tumors selection.在 RECIST 1.1 二期临床试验中评估的差异 - 裁决率与图像和肿瘤选择的变异性之间的关系。
Cancer Imaging. 2018 Dec 11;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40644-018-0186-0.
6
Pearls and pitfalls of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1 non-target lesion assessment.实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)v1.1 非靶病灶评估的要点与陷阱。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Feb;44(2):766-774. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1752-4.
7
Outcomes of patients with solid tumour malignancies treated with first-line immuno-oncology agents who do not meet eligibility criteria for clinical trials.不符合临床试验入选标准的一线免疫肿瘤药物治疗的实体瘤恶性肿瘤患者的结局。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jul;151:115-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 May 8.
8
Generating Real-World Tumor Burden Endpoints from Electronic Health Record Data: Comparison of RECIST, Radiology-Anchored, and Clinician-Anchored Approaches for Abstracting Real-World Progression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.从电子健康记录数据中生成真实世界的肿瘤负担终点:RECIST、放射学锚定和临床医生锚定方法在非小细胞肺癌真实世界进展中的比较。
Adv Ther. 2019 Aug;36(8):2122-2136. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00970-1. Epub 2019 May 28.
9
Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial.阿替利珠单抗用于接受铂类化疗后病情进展的局部晚期和转移性尿路上皮癌患者:一项单臂、多中心、2期试验。
Lancet. 2016 May 7;387(10031):1909-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00561-4. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
10
Response Assessment in Paediatric Phase I Trials According to RECIST Guidelines: Survival Outcomes, Patterns of Progression and Relevance of Changes in Tumour Measurements.根据RECIST指南对儿科I期试验进行疗效评估:生存结果、进展模式及肿瘤测量变化的相关性
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 Aug;63(8):1400-6. doi: 10.1002/pbc.26039. Epub 2016 May 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Objective response rate and progression-free survival as surrogates for overall survival treatment effect: A meta-analysis across diverse tumour groups and contemporary therapies.客观缓解率和无进展生存期作为总生存期治疗效果的替代指标:一项跨越不同肿瘤亚组和当代治疗方法的荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2024 Feb;198:113503. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113503. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
2
European Society of Endocrinology clinical practice guidelines on the management of adrenal incidentalomas, in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors.欧洲内分泌学会与欧洲肾上腺肿瘤研究网络合作制定的关于肾上腺意外瘤处理的临床实践指南。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2023 Jul 20;189(1):G1-G42. doi: 10.1093/ejendo/lvad066.
3
FDA validation of surrogate endpoints in oncology: 2005-2022.
FDA 在肿瘤学中对替代终点的验证:2005-2022 年。
J Cancer Policy. 2022 Dec;34:100364. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100364. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
4
Lessons learned: the first consecutive 1000 patients of the CCCMunich Molecular Tumor Board.经验教训:慕尼黑 CCC 分子肿瘤委员会的前 1000 例连续患者。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 May;149(5):1905-1915. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04165-0. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
5
Adagrasib in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring a Mutation.在携带有突变的非小细胞肺癌中使用阿达格拉西布。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 14;387(2):120-131. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204619. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
6
Clinical endpoints in oncology - a primer.肿瘤学中的临床终点——入门指南。
Am J Cancer Res. 2021 Apr 15;11(4):1121-1131. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparison of Solid Tumor Treatment Response Observed in Clinical Practice With Response Reported in Clinical Trials.比较临床实践中观察到的实体瘤治疗反应与临床试验中报告的反应。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036741. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36741.
8
Molecular Tumor Boards in Clinical Practice.分子肿瘤委员会在临床实践中的应用。
Trends Cancer. 2020 Sep;6(9):738-744. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
9
The requirements of a specialist breast centre.专科乳腺中心的要求。
Breast. 2020 Jun;51:65-84. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
10
ECCO Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care: Prostate cancer.欧洲癌症护理质量标准基本要求:前列腺癌。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020 Apr;148:102861. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.102861. Epub 2020 Jan 7.