Suppr超能文献

旨在减少老年住院患者和接近生命终点人群非获益性治疗的前瞻性反馈回路的影响。一项群组整群随机对照试验。

Impact of a prospective feedback loop aimed at reducing non-beneficial treatments in older people admitted to hospital and potentially nearing the end of life. A cluster stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.

Digital Health and Informatics Directorate, Metro South Health, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2024 Jun 1;53(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae115.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate if a prospective feedback loop that flags older patients at risk of death can reduce non-beneficial treatment at end of life.

DESIGN

Prospective stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial with usual care and intervention phases.

SETTING

Three large tertiary public hospitals in south-east Queensland, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

14 clinical teams were recruited across the three hospitals. Teams were recruited based on a consistent history of admitting patients aged 75+ years, and needed a nominated lead specialist consultant. Under the care of these teams, there were 4,268 patients (median age 84 years) who were potentially near the end of life and flagged at risk of non-beneficial treatment.

INTERVENTION

The intervention notified clinicians of patients under their care determined as at-risk of non-beneficial treatment. There were two notification flags: a real-time notification and an email sent to clinicians about the at-risk patients at the end of each screening day. The nudge intervention ran for 16-35 weeks across the three hospitals.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with one or more intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. The secondary outcomes examined times from patients being flagged at-risk.

RESULTS

There was no improvement in the primary outcome of reduced ICU admissions (mean probability difference [intervention minus usual care] = -0.01, 95% confidence interval -0.08 to 0.01). There were no differences for the times to death, discharge, or medical emergency call. There was a reduction in the probability of re-admission to hospital during the intervention phase (mean probability difference -0.08, 95% confidence interval -0.13 to -0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This nudge intervention was not sufficient to reduce the trial's non-beneficial treatment outcomes in older hospital patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12619000675123 (registered 6 May 2019).

摘要

目的

探究前瞻性反馈循环是否可以减少生命终末期无益治疗,从而识别出高危死亡的老年患者。

设计

前瞻性阶梯式楔形聚类随机试验,设常规护理和干预阶段。

地点

澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部的三家大型三级公立医院。

参与者

三家医院共招募了 14 个临床团队。这些团队的招募基于一个一致的历史,即纳入 75 岁以上的患者,并且需要指定的首席专科顾问。在这些团队的护理下,有 4268 名(中位年龄 84 岁)可能接近生命终末期的患者被确定为有接受无益治疗的风险。

干预措施

干预措施会通知临床医生其负责的患者被确定为有接受无益治疗风险的患者。有两种通知标志:实时通知和每天筛查结束时发送给临床医生的关于高危患者的电子邮件。该干预措施在三家医院实施了 16-35 周。

主要观察指标

主要结局是 ICU 入院人数的比例。次要结局检查了从患者被确定为高危患者开始的时间。

结果

减少 ICU 入院的主要结局没有改善(干预组减去常规护理组的平均概率差异[差值]为-0.01,95%置信区间为-0.08 至 0.01)。死亡、出院或医疗急救电话的时间没有差异。干预期间再次入院的概率降低(平均概率差异为-0.08,95%置信区间为-0.13 至-0.03)。

结论

这种轻推干预措施不足以减少老年住院患者的试验无益治疗结果。

试验注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册处,ACTRN12619000675123(2019 年 5 月 6 日注册)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62d/11162291/3547bc917c1a/afae115f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验