Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 6;13(3):e063267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063267.
The objective of this study is to better understand how the COVID-19 outbreak impacted the different domains of the palliative care approach to end-of-life care from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs) from different professions, working in different settings during the first months of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Netherlands.
An in-depth qualitative interview study among 16 HCPs of patients who died between March and July 2020 in different healthcare settings in the Netherlands. The HCPs were recruited through an online survey about end-of-life care. Maximum variation sampling was used. Data were analysed following the principles of thematic analysis.
Several aspects impacted the quality of the palliative care approach to care at the end of life. First, COVID-19 was a new disease and this led to challenges in the physical domain of end-of-life care, for example, a lack of knowledge on how to manage symptoms and an unreliable clinical view. Second, the high workload HCPs experienced impacted the quality of end-of-life care, especially in the emotional, social and spiritual domains, since they only had time for urgent, physical care. Third, COVID-19 is a contagious disease and measures taken to prevent the spread of the virus hampered care for both patients and relatives. For example, because of the visiting restrictions, HCPs were not able to provide emotional support to relatives. Finally, the COVID-19 outbreak also had a potentially positive impact in the longer term, for example, more awareness of advance care planning and the importance of end-of-life care that includes all the domains.
The palliative care approach, which is key to good end-of-life care, was often negatively influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic, predominantly in the emotional, social and spiritual domains. This was related to a focus on essential physical care and prevention of the spread of COVID-19.
本研究旨在更好地了解 COVID-19 大流行如何从不同专业医疗保健专业人员(HCP)的角度影响临终关怀方法的不同领域,这些 HCP 来自荷兰 COVID-19 大流行的最初几个月期间在不同环境中工作。
对 16 名 HCP 进行深入的定性访谈研究,这些 HCP 的患者在 2020 年 3 月至 7 月期间在荷兰不同的医疗保健环境中去世。HCP 通过一项关于临终关怀的在线调查招募。使用最大变异抽样。数据按照主题分析的原则进行分析。
几个方面影响了临终关怀方法的质量。首先,COVID-19 是一种新疾病,这导致了临终护理身体方面的挑战,例如缺乏管理症状的知识和不可靠的临床观点。其次,HCP 经历的高工作量影响了临终关怀的质量,特别是在情感、社会和精神领域,因为他们只有时间进行紧急的身体护理。第三,COVID-19 是一种传染病,为防止病毒传播而采取的措施阻碍了对患者和亲属的护理。例如,由于探视限制,HCP 无法为亲属提供情感支持。最后,COVID-19 大流行也在长期内产生了潜在的积极影响,例如,更多地意识到预先护理计划的重要性和包括所有领域的临终关怀的重要性。
临终关怀方法是良好临终关怀的关键,它经常受到 COVID-19 大流行的负面影响,主要是在情感、社会和精神领域。这与专注于基本的身体护理和预防 COVID-19 的传播有关。