• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑避孕选择的年轻女性的决策需求和干预措施:伞式综述。

Decisional needs and interventions for young women considering contraceptive options: an umbrella review.

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South - Eastern Norway , Kjølnes ring 56, Porsgrunn, N3918, Norway.

Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jun 8;24(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03172-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12905-024-03172-2
PMID:38851748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11162067/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although women face a wide range of contraceptive options, globally, young women are at risk of unintended pregnancies. Our umbrella review aimed to determine the decisional needs of nulligravida women aged 11 to 30 considering contraceptive options and identify effective interventions to support their involvement in making decisions about contraceptive use.

METHODS

We followed Joanna Briggs Institute methods for umbrella reviews, theoretically guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. We searched six electronic databases. Two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted data, and appraised quality using AMSTAR2. We analysed findings descriptively.

RESULTS

Of 124 citations, we identified 11 reviews of variable quality (critically low to moderate quality): Six reported decisional needs and 5 reported on interventions. Decisional needs of young women were: (a) information needs about contraceptive options (e.g., mechanism of actions, eligibility, administration, side effects); (b) unclear values (concerns about hormone use) and features of different options (based on their religious values); and (c) need for support and resources (support from society and need for privacy). Compared to controls, decision support interventions including patient decision aids and patient education material increased knowledge and improved discussion of options with their clinicians.

CONCLUSION

Young women making contraceptive decisions experience unmet decisional needs. Effective interventions such as patient decision aids and general patient education materials may address their decisional needs and enhance their level of participation in making contraception decisions. Implications and contribution to the field: Young women's decisional needs when considering contraceptive use are informational needs, unclear values (including religious influences), need for support and resources when facing this decision. Interventions, such as patient decision aid and patient education material can, address decisional needs by improving young women's knowledge about contraceptive options.

摘要

背景

尽管女性有多种避孕选择,但全球范围内,年轻女性仍面临意外怀孕的风险。我们的综述旨在确定考虑避孕选择的 11 至 30 岁的初产妇的决策需求,并确定有效的干预措施,以支持她们参与避孕决策。

方法

我们遵循循证卫生保健国际合作组织的伞状评价方法,理论上以渥太华决策支持框架为指导。我们搜索了六个电子数据库。两名审查员独立筛选引文、提取数据,并使用 AMSTAR2 评估质量。我们对发现进行了描述性分析。

结果

在 124 条引文,我们确定了 11 条质量不同的综述(批判性低至中等质量):6 条报告了决策需求,5 条报告了干预措施。年轻女性的决策需求包括:(a)对避孕选择的信息需求(例如,作用机制、资格、管理、副作用);(b)价值观不明确(对激素使用的担忧)和不同选择的特征(基于其宗教价值观);(c)支持和资源的需求(来自社会的支持和隐私的需求)。与对照组相比,决策支持干预措施,包括患者决策辅助工具和患者教育材料,增加了知识,改善了与临床医生讨论选择的情况。

结论

做出避孕决策的年轻女性存在未满足的决策需求。有效的干预措施,如患者决策辅助工具和一般患者教育材料,可以满足他们的决策需求,提高他们参与避孕决策的程度。对该领域的影响和贡献:年轻女性在考虑使用避孕措施时的决策需求包括信息需求、价值观不明确(包括宗教影响)、在面临这一决策时需要支持和资源。患者决策辅助工具和患者教育材料等干预措施可以通过提高年轻女性对避孕选择的了解来满足决策需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fed1/11162067/05c925ad0e9a/12905_2024_3172_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fed1/11162067/05c925ad0e9a/12905_2024_3172_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fed1/11162067/05c925ad0e9a/12905_2024_3172_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Decisional needs and interventions for young women considering contraceptive options: an umbrella review.考虑避孕选择的年轻女性的决策需求和干预措施:伞式综述。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jun 8;24(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03172-2.
2
The Impact of a Digital Contraceptive Decision Aid on User Outcomes: Results of an Experimental, Clinical Trial.数字避孕决策辅助工具对用户结局的影响:一项实验性、临床试验的结果。
Ann Behav Med. 2024 Jun 18;58(7):463-473. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaae024.
3
Exploring young women's decisional needs for contraceptive method choice: a qualitative study.探索年轻女性在选择避孕方法时的决策需求:一项定性研究。
Contraception. 2018 Mar;97(3):243-248. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
4
An interactive website for informed contraception choice: randomised evaluation of .一个用于明智避孕选择的交互式网站:……的随机评估
Digit Health. 2020 Jun 26;6:2055207620936435. doi: 10.1177/2055207620936435. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
5
Patient perceptions of a decision support tool to assist with young women's contraceptive choice.患者对一种辅助年轻女性进行避孕选择的决策支持工具的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Feb;100(2):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.022. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
7
An interactive website to aid young women's choice of contraception: feasibility and efficacy RCT.一个互动网站,帮助年轻女性选择避孕方法:可行性和有效性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(56):1-44. doi: 10.3310/hta24560.
8
20th Anniversary Ottawa Decision Support Framework: Part 3 Overview of Systematic Reviews and Updated Framework.第 20 届渥太华决策支持框架周年纪念:第 3 部分 系统评价概述和更新框架。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Apr;40(3):379-398. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20911870.
9
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.
10
20th Anniversary Update of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework Part 1: A Systematic Review of the Decisional Needs of People Making Health or Social Decisions.《渥太华决策支持框架》20周年更新 第1部分:对做出健康或社会决策者决策需求的系统评价
Med Decis Making. 2020 Jul;40(5):555-581. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20936209. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Incretin Hormone Secretion in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Roles of Obesity, Insulin Sensitivity and Treatment with Metformin and GLP-1s.多囊卵巢综合征女性的肠促胰岛素分泌:肥胖、胰岛素敏感性以及二甲双胍和胰高血糖素样肽-1治疗的作用
Biomedicines. 2024 Mar 14;12(3):653. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12030653.
2
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.
3
"Lights and Shades" of Fertility Preservation in Transgender Men Patients: A Clinical and Pathological Review.
变性男性患者生育力保存的“光影”:临床与病理综述
Life (Basel). 2023 Jun 1;13(6):1312. doi: 10.3390/life13061312.
4
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents: A Review of Practices to Support Better Communication, Counseling, and Adherence.青少年长效可逆避孕:支持更好沟通、咨询及依从性的实践综述
Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2023 May 5;14:97-114. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S374268. eCollection 2023.
5
Patient-related characteristics considered to affect patient involvement in shared decision making about treatment: A scoping review of the qualitative literature.被认为会影响患者参与治疗共同决策的患者相关特征:定性文献的范围综述
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Jun;111:107677. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107677. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
6
Interventions to support contraceptive choice and use: a global systematic map of systematic reviews.支持避孕方法选择和使用的干预措施:系统评价的全球系统地图。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2023 Apr;28(2):83-91. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2022.2162337. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
7
The effectiveness of digital sexual health interventions for young adults: a systematic literature review (2010-2020).数字性健康干预对年轻成年人的效果:系统文献回顾(2010-2020 年)。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Feb 1;38(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac104.
8
Factors influencing contraception choice and use globally: a synthesis of systematic reviews.全球范围内影响避孕方法选择和使用的因素:系统评价综述。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2022 Oct;27(5):364-372. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2022.2096215. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
9
Effects of technology-based contraceptive decision aids: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于技术的避孕决策辅助工具的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Nov;227(5):705-713.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.050. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
10
Adolescent Perceptions of Technology-Based Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: A Systematic Review.青少年对基于技术的性健康和生殖健康服务的看法:系统评价。
J Adolesc Health. 2022 Nov;71(5):533-544. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 Jun 15.