Suppr超能文献

早期关节腔穿刺术治疗颞下颌关节关节痛:一项优越性试验。

Early Arthrocentesis for Temporomandibular Joint Arthralgia: A Superiority Trial.

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Clinical Research Centre, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Int Dent J. 2024 Dec;74(6):1362-1370. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.04.015. Epub 2024 Jun 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this superiority trial was to investigate the clinical outcomes of arthrocentesis as an early treatment supported by use of an occlusal splint vs use of an occlusal splint only in the management of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthralgia.

METHODS

Ninety-five adults presenting with TMJ arthralgia were recruited into the study and randomised into 2 groups: Group 1 received arthrocentesis as an early treatment supported by use of an occlusal splint, whereas group 2 received treatment with an occlusal splint only. Seventy-four patients (group 1: n = 37; group 2: n = 37) completed the 1-year follow-up schedule and were included in the final analysis. Reduction of pain intensity measured by a numeric rating scale and increase in mouth opening distance (unassisted maximal, assisted maximal, and pain-free) was seen in both treatment groups.

RESULTS

In group 1, pain intensity significantly decreased at 6 weeks and all subsequent time points compared with group 2. In terms of mouth opening distance, a significant improvement was observed in both groups during the course of treatment, but statistical significance was not seen between the 2 treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Early arthrocentesis supported by use of an occlusal splint is superior to use of an occlusal splint alone in the treatment of TMJ arthralgia. Arthrocentesis with occlusal splint support could be discussed as first-line treatment for arthralgia of the TMJ, which may co-occur with various painful and nonpainful conditions of TMJ disorders.

摘要

目的

本优势试验旨在研究关节腔穿刺术联合咬合夹板治疗与单纯使用咬合夹板治疗颞下颌关节(TMJ)关节炎的临床效果。

方法

共招募了 95 名成人 TMJ 关节炎患者参与本研究,并将其随机分为两组:组 1 接受关节腔穿刺术联合咬合夹板治疗,组 2 仅接受咬合夹板治疗。74 例患者(组 1:n = 37;组 2:n = 37)完成了 1 年的随访,并纳入最终分析。两组患者的疼痛强度(采用数字评分量表评估)和张口度(自主最大张口度、辅助最大张口度和无痛张口度)均有所改善。

结果

在组 1 中,与组 2 相比,患者的疼痛强度在 6 周及之后的所有时间点均显著降低。在张口度方面,两组患者在治疗过程中均有显著改善,但两组之间无统计学差异。

结论

关节腔穿刺术联合咬合夹板治疗 TMJ 关节炎优于单纯使用咬合夹板治疗。对于 TMJ 关节炎伴发的各种疼痛和非疼痛性疾病,关节腔穿刺术联合咬合夹板治疗可能可作为首选治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7597/11551560/76f881cbabb7/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验