• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行肾内手术治疗 10 岁以下儿童 1-2.5cm 上尿路结石的临床疗效比较。

Clinical efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of upper urinary tract calculus (1-2.5 cm) in children ≤10 years of age.

机构信息

Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.

Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.

出版信息

J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Aug;20(4):605.e1-605.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.019. Epub 2024 May 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.019
PMID:38851968
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With improvements in endoscopic surgery, open surgical procedures for urinary system stones have cleared the path for the use of less invasive treatment modalities in patients with pediatric kidney stone disease. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are among the treatment options available.

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively evaluate the outcomes of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for children ≤10 years of age with upper urinary tract calculus (1-2.5 cm).

STUDY DESIGN

Sixty pediatric patients with single or multiple renal stones (1-2.5 cm in diameter) were collected prospectively and equally divided into two groups to undergo RIRS or mini-PCNL. The operative and postoperative outcomes of both groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

The groups' mean ages and genders were comparable. The mean stone size for the RIRS group was 1.86 cm and 1.69 cm for the PCNL group (P = 0.449). The PCNL group had statistically longer mean fluoroscopy and hospitalization times. The stone-free rates (SFRs) after a single procedure were 27 (90%) in the PCNL group and 25 (83.33%) in the RIRS group (P = 0.706). The UAS was placed in 13 (43.33%) patients in the RIRS group. In the RIRS group, 14 (46.67%) children required preoperative DJ stent application to passively dilate the ureteric orifice. As regard post DJ stenting, 13 (46%) cases applied DJ in the mini PCNL group. major complications were observed in either group. Minor complication (Clavien 1-3) rates were 16.66% and 13.33% for the PCNL and RIRS groups, respectively. There were no differences found between the RIRS and mini-PCNL groups regarding operative time. The mean cost of RIRS was $703.96 and $537.03 for the mini-PCNL.

CONCLUSION

According to the results of this study, mini-PCNL and RIRS are effective procedures for treating renal stones in children up to 2.5 cm with comparable success and complication rates. Hospital stay, radiation exposure, and fluoroscopy time are significantly lower in RIRS than in the mini PCNL technique. Although RIRS is effective, a major disadvantage is the greater requirement for JJ stent insertion either before or after the procedure and the consequent need for a second procedure for removal.

摘要

背景

随着内镜手术的进步,泌尿系统结石的开放性手术为儿童肾结石疾病患者提供了更微创的治疗选择。体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)、经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)和逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)是可供选择的治疗方法之一。

目的

前瞻性评估微创经皮肾镜取石术和逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)治疗儿童(≤10 岁)上尿路结石(1-2.5cm)的结果。

研究设计

前瞻性收集了 60 名患有单个或多个肾结石(直径 1-2.5cm)的儿科患者,并将其平均分为两组,分别接受 RIRS 或 mini-PCNL 治疗。分析两组的手术和术后结果。

结果

两组的平均年龄和性别相当。RIRS 组的平均结石大小为 1.86cm,PCNL 组为 1.69cm(P=0.449)。PCNL 组的平均透视和住院时间明显更长。单次手术后的无结石率(SFR)在 PCNL 组为 27 例(90%),在 RIRS 组为 25 例(83.33%)(P=0.706)。RIRS 组中有 13 例(43.33%)患者放置了输尿管支架。在 RIRS 组中,14 名(46.67%)儿童需要术前 DJ 支架应用来被动扩张输尿管口。在 DJ 支架放置后,13 例(46%)mini-PCNL 组应用 DJ 支架。两组均未出现主要并发症。PCNL 和 RIRS 组的轻微并发症(Clavien 1-3)发生率分别为 16.66%和 13.33%。两组的手术时间无差异。RIRS 的平均费用为 703.96 美元,mini-PCNL 为 537.03 美元。

结论

根据本研究结果,mini-PCNL 和 RIRS 是治疗儿童 2.5cm 以下肾结石的有效方法,成功率和并发症发生率相当。RIRS 比 mini-PCNL 技术的住院时间、辐射暴露和透视时间明显更短。尽管 RIRS 有效,但一个主要缺点是在手术前后需要更大程度地插入 JJ 支架,因此需要进行第二次手术取出。

相似文献

1
Clinical efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of upper urinary tract calculus (1-2.5 cm) in children ≤10 years of age.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行肾内手术治疗 10 岁以下儿童 1-2.5cm 上尿路结石的临床疗效比较。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Aug;20(4):605.e1-605.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.019. Epub 2024 May 25.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术 (ESWL) 与经皮肾镜碎石取石术 (PCNL) 或逆行肾内手术 (RIRS) 治疗肾结石的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub4.
3
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗成人肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
4
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery versus percutaneuos nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric stone disease: A comparative analysis of efficacy and safety.内镜下联合肾内手术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗复杂小儿肾结石病:疗效和安全性的对比分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Aug;20(4):606.e1-606.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.025. Epub 2024 May 31.
5
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
6
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub2.
7
Flexible mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intra-renal surgery in the management of renal stones: a randomized controlled trial.柔性微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗肾结石的随机对照试验
World J Urol. 2025 May 26;43(1):328. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05689-z.
8
Different Tract Sizes of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.小型经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术不同通道大小的系统评价和Meta分析
J Endourol. 2017 Nov;31(11):1101-1110. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0547. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
9
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs flexible ureteroscopy for 1-2 cm lower pole renal stones: a randomised controlled trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管软镜治疗1-2厘米下极肾结石的随机对照试验
BJU Int. 2025 Mar;135(3):437-445. doi: 10.1111/bju.16567. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
10
Efficacy and safety of the surgical treatments for lower calyceal stones: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.下盏结石的外科治疗的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2023 Mar 1;109(3):383-388. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000062.

引用本文的文献

1
Contemporary metabolic evaluation, medical and minimally invasive management of stones in children.儿童结石的当代代谢评估、医学及微创管理
Urolithiasis. 2025 Aug 16;53(1):158. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01824-y.
2
Miniaturized Tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Pelvic Stone Management in a Two-Year-Old: A Case Report and Review of Literature.两岁幼儿盆腔结石管理的微型经皮肾镜取石术:一例报告及文献综述
Cureus. 2025 Feb 22;17(2):e79475. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79475. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Predictive value of scoring systems for stone free status and complications before percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children.
儿童经皮肾镜取石术前结石清除状态及并发症评分系统的预测价值
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 10;15(1):8292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91760-z.