University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Z Med Phys. 2024 Aug;34(3):397-407. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2024.05.001. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based online adaptation is increasingly being introduced into many clinics. Upon implementation of a new treatment technique, a prospective risk analysis is required and enhances workflow safety. We conducted a risk analysis using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) upon the introduction of an online adaptive treatment programme (Wegener et al., Z Med Phys. 2022). A prospective risk analysis, lacking in-depth clinical experience with a treatment modality or treatment machine, relies on imagination and estimates of the occurrence of different failure modes. Therefore, we systematically documented all irregularities during the first year of online adaptation, namely all cases in which quality assurance detected undesired states potentially leading to negative consequences. Additionally, the quality of automatic contouring was evaluated. Based on those quantitative data, the risk analysis was updated by an interprofessional team. Furthermore, a hypothetical radiation therapist-only workflow during adaptive sessions was included in the prospective analysis, as opposed to the involvement of an interprofessional team performing each adaptive treatment. A total of 126 irregularities were recorded during the first year. During that time period, many of the previously anticipated failure modes (almost) occurred, indicating that the initial prospective risk analysis captured relevant failure modes. However, some scenarios were not anticipated, emphasizing the limits of a prospective risk analysis. This underscores the need for regular updates to the risk analysis. The most critical failure modes are presented together with possible mitigation strategies. It was further noted that almost half of the reported irregularities applied to the non-adaptive treatments on this treatment machine, primarily due to a manual plan import step implemented in the institution's workflow.
基于锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的在线自适应正被越来越多地引入到许多临床中。在实施新的治疗技术时,需要进行前瞻性风险分析,以提高工作流程的安全性。我们在引入在线自适应治疗方案(Wegener 等人,Z Med Phys. 2022)时使用失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)进行了风险分析。前瞻性风险分析缺乏对治疗方式或治疗机器的深入临床经验,依赖于对不同失效模式发生的想象和估计。因此,我们系统地记录了在线自适应的第一年中的所有异常情况,即所有质量保证检测到潜在导致负面后果的不良状态的情况。此外,还评估了自动轮廓的质量。基于这些定量数据,由跨专业团队对风险分析进行了更新。此外,在前瞻性分析中还包括了假设的仅辐射治疗师在自适应治疗期间的工作流程,而不是由执行每个自适应治疗的跨专业团队参与。在第一年中记录了 126 次异常情况。在此期间,许多先前预期的失效模式(几乎)发生了,这表明初始前瞻性风险分析捕捉到了相关的失效模式。然而,一些情况并未预料到,这凸显了前瞻性风险分析的局限性。这强调了定期更新风险分析的必要性。最关键的失效模式与可能的缓解策略一起呈现。还注意到,报告的异常情况中近一半适用于该治疗机器上的非自适应治疗,主要是由于机构工作流程中实施的手动计划导入步骤。