University of Wuerzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Z Med Phys. 2024 Aug;34(3):384-396. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
The recently introduced Varian Ethos system allows adjusting radiotherapy treatment plans to anatomical changes on a daily basis. The system uses artificial intelligence to speed up the process of creating adapted plans, comes with its own software solutions and requires a substantially different workflow. A detailed analysis of possible risks of the associated workflow is presented.
A prospective risk analysis of the adaptive workflow with the Ethos system was performed using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). An interprofessional team collected possible adverse events and evaluated their severity as well as their chance of occurrence and detectability. Measures to reduce the risks were discussed.
A total of 122 events were identified, and scored. Within the 20 events with the highest-ranked risks, the following were identified: Challenges due to the stand-alone software solution with very limited connectivity to the existing record and verify software and digital patient file, unfamiliarity with the new software and its limitations and the adaption process relying on results obtained by artificial intelligence. The risk analysis led to the implementation of additional quality assurance measures in the workflow.
The thorough analysis of the risks associated with the new treatment technique was the basis for designing details of the workflow. The analysis also revealed challenges to be addressed by both, the vendor and customers. On the vendor side, this includes improving communication between their different software solutions. On the customer side, this especially includes establishing validation strategies to monitor the results of the black box adaption process making use of artificial intelligence.
最近推出的瓦里安 Ethos 系统允许每天根据解剖结构变化调整放射治疗计划。该系统使用人工智能来加速制定适应计划的过程,它有自己的软件解决方案,需要一种截然不同的工作流程。本文介绍了相关工作流程可能存在的风险。
使用失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)对 Ethos 系统的自适应工作流程进行了前瞻性风险分析。一个跨专业团队收集了可能的不良事件,并评估了其严重程度、发生概率和可检测性。还讨论了降低风险的措施。
共确定了 122 个事件,并进行了评分。在风险最高的 20 个事件中,包括:由于与现有记录和验证软件及数字患者档案连接非常有限的独立软件解决方案带来的挑战、对新软件及其限制的不熟悉、以及依赖人工智能获得的结果进行调整的过程。风险分析导致在工作流程中实施了额外的质量保证措施。
对新技术相关风险的彻底分析是设计工作流程细节的基础。分析还揭示了供应商和客户都需要解决的挑战。在供应商方面,这包括改善其不同软件解决方案之间的沟通。在客户方面,这尤其包括制定验证策略,以利用人工智能监测黑盒调整过程的结果。