ABCD研究数据中环境风险因素及累积压力与种族/族裔认同和类精神病体验之间关联的证据
Evidence for Environmental Risk Factors and Cumulative Stress Linking Racial/Ethnic Identity and Psychotic-Like Experiences in ABCD Study Data.
作者信息
Petti Emily, Schiffman Jason, Oh Hans, Karcher Nicole R
机构信息
University of California, Irvine, California.
University of California, Irvine, California.
出版信息
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;64(3):386-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
OBJECTIVE
Previous work has found increased endorsement of psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) among marginalized racial and ethnic groups. According to social determinants frameworks, marginalized groups are at increased risk for exposure to socioenvironmental risk factors, including systemic factors (eg, poverty and poor housing conditions) and social stressors (eg, discrimination). We examine the extent to which environmental risk factors and stress account for associations between racial/ethnic groups with PLEs.
METHOD
Analyses included 11,876 young adolescents 9 to 10 years of age from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. Mediation models assessed whether stress at 1-year follow-up indirectly linked baseline environmental risk to later distressing PLEs at 2-year follow-up. Serial mediation models examined whether environmental risk and stress indirectly accounted for variation among racial/ethnic groups in self-reported distressing PLEs.
RESULTS
Through principal component and mediation analyses, we found evidence that the link between environmental risk (eg, poverty and exposure to crime) and distressing PLEs was mediated by stress. There was also evidence that higher endorsement of distressing PLEs within the Black and Hispanic groups was serially mediated by greater environmental risk and greater stress.
CONCLUSION
The analyses provide evidence that the associations between marginalized racial and ethnic identities with the endorsement of PLEs partially reflects the sequelae of systemic socioenvironmental factors. Findings suggest the potential for intervening upon environmental risk factors to target the reduction of cumulative stress over time, which may in turn buffer against the development of PLEs.
PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY
Using longitudinal data from 11,876 young adolescents aged 9 to 10 from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, this study examined environmental (eg, poverty, exposure to crime) and stress-related factors (eg, experiences of discrimination, childhood adversity) that were associated with psychotic-like experiences, and whether these factors explained racial/ethnic differences in psychotic-like experiences (PLE). Principle component and mediation analysis found an association between environmental risk and PLEs was partially explained by cumulative stress. Differences in PLEs across racial/ethnic groups were accounted for by both environmental risk and stress. Results highlight that systemic factors may explain higher levels of PLEs among historically marginalized racial/ethnic groups. Findings suggest the potential for intervening upon modifiable risk factors to buffer against stress and reduce the risk of developing PLEs.
DIVERSITY INCLUSION STATEMENT
We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way.
目的
以往研究发现,在边缘化种族和族裔群体中,对类精神病体验(PLEs)的认同度有所增加。根据社会决定因素框架,边缘化群体面临社会环境风险因素的风险增加,包括系统性因素(如贫困和恶劣的住房条件)和社会压力源(如歧视)。我们研究了环境风险因素和压力在多大程度上解释了种族/族裔群体与PLEs之间的关联。
方法
分析纳入了来自青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究的11876名9至10岁的青少年。中介模型评估了1年随访时的压力是否将基线环境风险与2年随访时后来令人苦恼的PLEs间接联系起来。系列中介模型检验了环境风险和压力是否间接解释了自我报告的令人苦恼的PLEs在种族/族裔群体中的差异。
结果
通过主成分分析和中介分析,我们发现有证据表明环境风险(如贫困和接触犯罪)与令人苦恼的PLEs之间的联系是由压力介导的。也有证据表明,黑人和西班牙裔群体中对令人苦恼的PLEs的较高认同度是由更大的环境风险和更大的压力系列介导的。
结论
分析提供了证据,表明边缘化种族和族裔身份与PLEs认同之间的关联部分反映了系统性社会环境因素的后果。研究结果表明,有可能通过干预环境风险因素来减少随着时间推移累积的压力,这反过来可能缓冲PLEs的发展。
通俗易懂的总结
本研究使用来自青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究的11876名9至10岁青少年的纵向数据,研究了与类精神病体验相关的环境(如贫困、接触犯罪)和压力相关因素(如歧视经历、童年逆境),以及这些因素是否解释了类精神病体验(PLE)中的种族/族裔差异。主成分分析和中介分析发现,环境风险与PLEs之间的关联部分由累积压力解释。不同种族/族裔群体在PLEs上的差异由环境风险和压力共同解释。结果强调,系统性因素可能解释了历史上边缘化种族/族裔群体中较高水平的PLEs。研究结果表明,有可能通过干预可改变的风险因素来缓冲压力并降低发展为PLEs的风险。
多样性包容声明
我们努力确保在招募人类参与者时实现性别平衡。本文的一位或多位作者自我认同为科学领域中一个或多个历史上代表性不足的种族和/或族裔群体的成员。本文的一位或多位作者自我认同为科学领域中一个或多个历史上代表性不足的性取向和/或性别群体的成员。我们积极努力在作者群体中促进性别平衡。我们努力确保在招募人类参与者时实现种族、族裔和/或其他类型的多样性。我们努力确保研究问卷以包容的方式编制。