Department of Evidenced-based Medicine, Centro Universitário Lusíada, Santos, SP, Brazil.
Department of Surgery, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Transplant Proc. 2024 Jun;56(5):1066-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.05.014. Epub 2024 Jun 9.
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) associated with tacrolimus (TAC) in patients undergoing kidney-pancreas and kidney transplants, in comparison with cyclosporine (CyA), azathioprine (AZA), everolimus (EVL), sirolimus (SRL), manitimus (MAN), mizoribine (MZR), and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (ECMPS) in combination or monotherapy.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials was performed. The outcomes comprised acute rejection, graft loss, and adverse events.
Thirty studies were included. The main adverse events related to the TAC+MMF scheme were infection (36%; 95%CI: 26%-46%), including cytomegalovirus (CMV) (14%; 95%CI: 8%-20%); anemia (20%; 95%CI: 2%-37%); leukopenia (18%; 95%CI: 3%-33%); nausea (20%; 95%CI: 1%-39%); and diarrhea (26%; 95%CI:13%-40%). TAC+MMF was compared to the schemes AZA+TAC, CyA+AZA, CyA+MMF, CyA+SRL, ECMPS, EVL, MAN+TAC, MMF+SRL, MZR, TAC+AZA, TAC+EVR, TAC+MZR, TAC +SRL and TAC. TAC+MMF was associated with a lower risk of rejection than MMF monotherapy (RD: -0.24; 95%CI -0.46; -0.02). Comparing TAC+MMF with the other regimens, no significant difference was found for graft loss. TAC+MMF was associated with a higher risk of infections than MZR (RD: 0.174; 95%CI: 0.25; 0.323) and TAC monotherapy (RD: 0.07; 95%CI 0.003; 0.138).
Gastrointestinal and hematological adverse events and infections are the most common with TAC+MMF for kidney-pancreas and kidney. TAC+MMF effectively prevents acute cellular rejection, and alternatives with AZA, CyA, SRL, ECMPS, EVL, MAN, and MSR have similar efficacy and safety profiles. TAC monotherapy and MZR may be associated with a lower risk of infections.
本研究评估了霉酚酸酯(MMF)联合他克莫司(TAC)在接受胰肾和肾移植患者中的疗效和安全性,与环孢素(CyA)、硫唑嘌呤(AZA)、依维莫司(EVL)、西罗莫司(SRL)、吗替麦考酚酯(MAN)、麦考酚酯钠肠溶片(ECMPS)联合或单药治疗相比。
进行了系统的文献回顾和荟萃分析。结果包括急性排斥反应、移植物丢失和不良事件。
共纳入 30 项研究。与 TAC+MMF 方案相关的主要不良事件为感染(36%;95%CI:26%-46%),包括巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染(14%;95%CI:8%-20%);贫血(20%;95%CI:2%-37%);白细胞减少症(18%;95%CI:3%-33%);恶心(20%;95%CI:1%-39%)和腹泻(26%;95%CI:13%-40%)。TAC+MMF 与 AZA+TAC、CyA+AZA、CyA+MMF、CyA+SRL、ECMPS、EVL、MAN+TAC、MMF+SRL、MZR、TAC+AZA、TAC+EVR、TAC+MZR、TAC+SRL 和 TAC 方案进行了比较。与 MMF 单药治疗相比,TAC+MMF 降低排斥反应风险(RD:-0.24;95%CI:-0.46;-0.02)。与其他方案相比,TAC+MMF 并未降低移植物丢失风险。与 MZR(RD:0.174;95%CI:0.25;0.323)和 TAC 单药治疗(RD:0.07;95%CI:0.003;0.138)相比,TAC+MMF 更易发生感染。
TAC+MMF 治疗胰肾和肾移植患者,胃肠道和血液学不良事件及感染较为常见。TAC+MMF 可有效预防急性细胞排斥反应,而 AZA、CyA、SRL、ECMPS、EVL、MAN 和 MSR 等替代方案具有相似的疗效和安全性。TAC 单药治疗和 MZR 可能降低感染风险。