Ravichandran Siddharth, Najafi Mahsa, Goeminne Ruben, Denayer Joeri F M, Van Speybroeck Veronique, Vanduyfhuys Louis
Center for Molecular Modeling (CMM), Ghent University, Technologiepark 46, Zwijnaarde 9052, Belgium.
Department of Chemical Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels 1050, Belgium.
J Chem Theory Comput. 2024 Jun 25;20(12):5225-5240. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00293. Epub 2024 Jun 9.
Nanoporous materials in the form of metal-organic frameworks such as zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) are promising membrane materials for the separation of hydrocarbon mixtures. To compute the adsorption isotherms in such adsorbents, grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations have proven to be very useful. The quality of these isotherms depends on the accuracy of adsorbate-adsorbent interactions, which are mostly described using force fields owing to their low computational cost. However, force field predictions of adsorption uptake often show discrepancies from experiments at low pressures, providing the need for methods that are more accurate. Hence, in this work, we propose and validate two novel methodologies for the ZIF-8/ethane and ethene systems; a benchmarking methodology to evaluate the performance of any given force field in describing adsorption in the low-pressure regime and a refinement procedure to rescale the parameters of a force field to better describe the host-guest interactions and provide for simulation isotherms with close agreement to experimental isotherms. Both methodologies were developed based on a reference Henry coefficient, computed with the PBE-MBD functional using the importance sampling technique. The force field rankings predicted by the benchmarking methodology involve the comparison of force field derived Henry coefficients with the reference Henry coefficients and ranking the force fields based on the disparities between these Henry coefficients. The ranking from this methodology matches the rankings made based on uptake disparities by comparing force field derived simulation isotherms to experimental isotherms in the low-pressure regime. The force field rescaling methodology was proven to refine even the worst performing force field in UFF/TraPPE. The uptake disparities of UFF/TraPPE improved from 197% and 194% to 11% and 21% for ethane and ethene, respectively. The proposed methodology is applicable to predict adsorption across nanoporous materials and allows for rescaled force fields to reach quantum accuracy without the need for experimental input.
金属有机框架形式的纳米多孔材料,如沸石咪唑酯骨架结构-8(ZIF-8),是用于分离烃类混合物的有前景的膜材料。为了计算此类吸附剂中的吸附等温线,巨正则蒙特卡罗模拟已被证明非常有用。这些等温线的质量取决于吸附质与吸附剂相互作用的准确性,由于计算成本低,这些相互作用大多使用力场来描述。然而,力场对吸附量的预测在低压下往往与实验结果存在差异,这就需要更精确的方法。因此,在这项工作中,我们针对ZIF-8/乙烷和乙烯体系提出并验证了两种新方法;一种基准测试方法,用于评估任何给定力场在描述低压区域吸附时的性能,以及一种优化程序,用于重新调整力场参数,以更好地描述主客体相互作用,并提供与实验等温线高度吻合的模拟等温线。这两种方法都是基于参考亨利系数开发的,该系数使用重要性抽样技术通过PBE-MBD泛函计算得出。基准测试方法预测的力场排名涉及将力场导出的亨利系数与参考亨利系数进行比较,并根据这些亨利系数之间的差异对力场进行排名。通过将力场导出的模拟等温线与低压区域的实验等温线进行比较,该方法的排名与基于吸附量差异的排名相匹配。力场重新缩放方法被证明即使是UFF/TraPPE中性能最差的力场也能得到优化。UFF/TraPPE对乙烷和乙烯的吸附量差异分别从197%和194%降至11%和21%。所提出的方法适用于预测纳米多孔材料的吸附,并允许重新缩放的力场在无需实验输入的情况下达到量子精度。