Poirier J, Derouesné C
Rev Neurol (Paris). 1985;141(1):3-17.
The term lacunae was first used by Dechambre (1838) referring to small cavities developed during the process of resorption within cerebral softenings. Some years later, lacunae was applied by Durand-Fardel (1843) to small cavities located in the basal ganglia and hypothetically attributed to old, healed cerebral softenings. Durand-Fardel (1842, 1854) described "l'état criblé" as many round small holes ("criblures") always containing a patient blood vessel and located in the hemispheric white matter. He believed that "état criblé" was caused by mechanical compression of cerebral tissue related to the dilatation of the blood cerebral vessels during repetitive cerebral congestion. Chronic dementia or delirium were considered as the clinical counterpart of "état criblé". In the second half of the XIXth century, the few reports about lacunae were confusing due to the imprecise use of the terms "lacunae" and "état criblé". Furthermore, some authors described lacunae as sequelae of haemorrhage, others as old softenings or both. In the beginning of the XXth century, the masterly work of P. Marie (1901) established a clear distinction between the "foyers lacunaires de désintégration" and "état criblé" de Durand-Fardel or single perivascular dilatation of one of the lenticulo-striate arteries at its entrance into the lenticular nucleus or post-mortem charges (cerebral porosity, "état de fromage de gruyère"). He described lacunae as small cerebral softenings caused by occlusion of the blood vessels by a "local arteriosclerotic process". However, he also stated that some lacunae containing a patent blood vessel were due to a perivascular space dilatation destroying the adjacent brain parenchyma by a process of "destructive vaginalitis". Marie observed that lacunae were frequently clinically asymptomatic, but "that the hemiplegia of the old people was more often due to cerebral lacunae than to cerebral haemorrhage or softening". During the first half of the XXth century, all the papers devoted to cerebral lacunae were in accordance with the work of P. Marie, developing his own's contradictions. Many authors emphasized the "destructive vaginalitis way" and claimed that lacunae were dilatations of the perivascular spaces. Many other authors developed the "softening way" masterfully illustrated by Fisher who considered lacunae as small deep infarcts caused by a specific pathological process of lipohyalinosis due to arteriolar wall modification by hypertensive disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
“腔隙”一词最早由德尚布尔(1838年)使用,指的是脑软化吸收过程中形成的小腔。几年后,杜兰德 - 法德尔(1843年)将“腔隙”用于基底神经节中的小腔,推测其归因于陈旧性、已愈合的脑软化。杜兰德 - 法德尔(1842年、1854年)将“筛状状态”描述为许多圆形小孔(“筛孔”),总是含有一条细小血管,位于半球白质中。他认为“筛状状态”是由于反复脑充血期间脑血管扩张导致脑组织机械性压迫所致。慢性痴呆或谵妄被认为是“筛状状态”的临床对应表现。在19世纪下半叶,由于“腔隙”和“筛状状态”这两个术语使用不精确,关于腔隙的少数报告令人困惑。此外,一些作者将腔隙描述为出血的后遗症,另一些作者则描述为陈旧性软化或两者皆是。在20世纪初,P. 玛丽(1901年)的精湛著作明确区分了“腔隙性崩解灶”与杜兰德 - 法德尔的“筛状状态”,或豆纹动脉之一进入豆状核处的单个血管周围扩张或死后变化(脑多孔性,“格鲁耶尔奶酪状态”)。他将腔隙描述为由“局部动脉硬化过程”导致血管闭塞引起的小的脑软化。然而,他也指出一些含有通畅血管的腔隙是由于血管周围间隙扩张,通过“破坏性阴道炎”过程破坏了相邻的脑实质。玛丽观察到腔隙在临床上常常无症状,但“老年人的偏瘫更多是由于脑腔隙而非脑出血或软化”。在20世纪上半叶,所有关于脑腔隙的论文都与P. 玛丽的工作一致,同时也发展了他自己的矛盾观点。许多作者强调“破坏性阴道炎方式”,并声称腔隙是血管周围间隙的扩张。许多其他作者则阐述了“软化方式”,费希尔对此进行了精彩阐述,他认为腔隙是由高血压疾病导致小动脉壁改变引起的脂质透明变性这一特定病理过程所致的小的深部梗死。(摘要截取自400字)