Komura Shingo, Hirakawa Akihiro, Hirose Hitoshi, Akiyama Haruhiko
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
J Hand Microsurg. 2024 May 14;16(2):100033. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768480. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Both arthrodesis and trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (T + LRTI) arthroplasty are reliable surgical procedures for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis. Here, we compared surgical outcomes between arthrodesis and T + LRTI for female workers aged over 40 years with thumb CMC osteoarthritis to determine an optimal procedure.
Fourteen thumbs of 13 patients who underwent arthrodesis with locking plates and 11 thumbs of 10 patients who underwent T + LRTI and were followed up for at least 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. For the two groups, we investigated the range of motion (ROM) of the thumb, grip strength, pinch strength, disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, Hand20 score, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain at 1-year follow-up and compared them between the two groups. In addition, we investigated surgical complications and resumption of work.
Both procedures provided similar subjective outcomes in terms of Hand20 and VAS scores; however, arthrodesis provided significantly larger ROM of the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints of the thumb, grip and pinch strength, and DASH score, whereas T + LRTI provided a significantly better palmar abduction at 1-year follow-up. There were three and four postoperative complications in the arthrodesis and T + LRTI groups, respectively. One patient in the arthrodesis group had resigned, whereas two patients in T + LRTI had changed their jobs to less physically demanding ones postoperatively.
Both procedures satisfy female workers aged over 40 years with thumb CMC osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, arthrodesis can provide favorable outcomes that are equal to or better than T + LRTI.
关节融合术以及带韧带重建和肌腱植入的大多角骨切除术(T + LRTI)关节成形术都是治疗拇指腕掌关节(CMC)骨关节炎的可靠手术方法。在此,我们比较了关节融合术和T + LRTI对40岁以上患有拇指CMC骨关节炎的女性工人的手术效果,以确定最佳手术方法。
回顾性分析了13例行锁定钢板关节融合术患者的14个拇指以及10例行T + LRTI手术且随访至少12个月患者的11个拇指。对于两组患者,我们在1年随访时调查了拇指的活动范围(ROM)、握力、捏力、手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分、Hand20评分以及疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,并对两组进行比较。此外,我们还调查了手术并发症和恢复工作情况。
就Hand20和VAS评分而言,两种手术方法的主观结果相似;然而,关节融合术使拇指掌指关节和指间关节的ROM、握力和捏力以及DASH评分显著更高,而T + LRTI在1年随访时使掌侧外展明显更好。关节融合术组和T + LRTI组分别有3例和4例术后并发症。关节融合术组有1例患者辞职,而T + LRTI组有2例患者术后更换了体力要求较低的工作。
两种手术方法都能使40岁以上患有拇指CMC骨关节炎的女性工人满意。尽管如此,关节融合术能提供等同于或优于T + LRTI的良好效果。